Pantone has been dominating the color industry for 60 years, offering tools that ensure color consistency across various printed materials worldwide. Designers and printers rely heavily on Pantone for its precision and accuracy, but many are starting to question the high costs associated with the brand. Some Pantone products can even exceed $1,000, leaving many wondering if there is a more affordable alternative.
Despite the steep prices, Pantone’s level of control and reliability have cemented its position as a staple in the design and printing world. The proprietary system behind Pantone colors ensures that the colors printed match the intended shade perfectly. This level of consistency is crucial for designers and businesses looking to maintain their brand image and message across various platforms and materials.
One key factor contributing to the high cost of Pantone colors is the process of mixing ink. Unlike the CMYK printing process, where colors are created by mixing cyan, magenta, yellow, and black inks, Pantone colors are pre-mixed to achieve the exact shade desired. This level of precision and attention to detail adds to the overall cost of Pantone products.
The split between Adobe and Pantone has also prompted designers to explore other color matching options. However, many continue to rely on Pantone for its shared language and consistent results. The importance of maintaining color consistency in branding and design cannot be understated, making Pantone colors a valuable asset despite their high price tag.
As designers and businesses continue to weigh the costs and benefits of using Pantone colors, the debate over their expense and necessity rages on. While some may seek out more affordable alternatives, Pantone’s longstanding reputation for color accuracy and reliability may be challenging to replace.
Watch the video by Business Insider
Video “Why Pantone Colors Are So Expensive | So Expensive | Business Insider” was uploaded on 04/19/2025 to Youtube Channel Business Insider
That is a job I would do
Yes, it's a monopoly. So glad there is CMYK. Pantone Bridge, thankfully, waant that expensive when I was a designer. To start charging designers to use the system in software is another horrible, and looks badly on Pantone/X-Rite.
Funny how the ones making money in Pantone doesn't see the issue with the monopoly. How many much do they spend on lobbying?
What about the RAL colour standard?
Designer from the Global South here
My personal brand uses “lamb-no-genie yellow” 😂
Because I am no Genie. Design is a science and my brand name is lamb (because l believe in Jesus)
Thank God my clientele works with Process🙌🏾
Thank you Business Insider, for reporting on Design. 🫶🏾🇿🇼
monopoly
Stuart Semple is such a bro.
You can get a printer to print a perfect color. Just check it with their pantone after.
i still dont get it, what the hell do they do.
still dont really understand why CMYK or whatever brand or other brands cant do similar stuff
This seemed like a Pantone corporate propaganda. It was a little informative, but it mostly tried to make unreasonable subscriptions seem fair.
I see monopoly over some colours…
But they don't bring the colours…
Is just the identity of the colour…
Sell your old guide books for a couple bob to a less well off designer.
Also I'm pretty sure these books are avaliable pirated on the Web somewhere. You'd just need to print them out properly, which would probably cost less than paying pantone 🤷🏻♂️
Isn't that monopoly? Meta had to sell Instagram because of monopoly. X-rite owns PANTONE and Munsell, only two Color Matching systems.
Pantone being referred to as a language got me excited for a second but Pantone's product is only a catalogue of names for colors. That's far from being a language. * sad linguist noises *
It's high time to have an organization that will unite the studios and designers for another coloring system.
I couldn't even finish watching the video — I’m furious. These people charge insane amounts of money without actually producing anything. They just sit on a patent and collect cash. And to make things worse, they design their color boxes to fade quickly so that people are forced to keep replacing them. Insane
Color matching systems should be non profit organization. This is standardization, not a invention. Someone could do the same with kg or lbs measurement units. There is no big difference except colors have much more varieties.
So inaccessible, very disappointing. I'm breaking my BACK trying to find someone who owns one of these STUPID systems so I can bloody tell a manufacturer. It should not be this hard, or this expensive.
AI will kill Pantone.
Wait !
I got an idea…
So I was thinking about the products selled on eBay that are questioned about the colour code on their products…
So if you buy something and it's under a colour code… For example the minions yellow… That means you can colour copy from an authentic colour coded product on to your products because that authentic product you just bought should be a fresh colour coded under license…
So if I buy a minion with a Universal license on the label and use that colour code to compare to my product it means I can label my products with that colour code because Pantone doesn't have the rights over my paint, only over the colour code…
So I can say "minion yellow" but not the actual Pantone code… Because then I have to pay Pantone 9000 dollars every 18 months!?
Wtf ?
🤯
At 16:35 she says that “the colours on her screen will match those in real life” this seems amazing to me since screens distort colours so much I’m amazed you can get any consistency between whatever screen you’re using and the colour of the paint!
🤯🤯🤯Today I learned about Pantone..🤯🤯🤯 sure smells ALOT like a Monopoly…
Scammers=Pantone, 2025, we now have HTML color standard (hex color)
Something like color should be universal, open source…but CAPITALISM BABY GOTTA MAKE THAT MONOPOLY!!!
Wouldn’t this be considered a monopoly? If they don’t want them to yellow, can’t they just laminate them or something similar?
I work at a print shop and we haven't updated our Adobe programs since they started requiring subscriptions. We still get to use our Pantone colors lol
Edit: oh yea and we haven't bought a new physical colorbook in the entire time I've worked here and same thing at my last job too. Shit's too expensive.
why expensive? capitalism baby
Seems like Pantone adds an additive coating to their booklets/Pantone bridge guide that yellow within 18 months deliberately, such greedy.
Perfect chance for an “over 9000!” Reference wasted
Taking people's project hostage was really shit move
One example of the ridiculousness is how Tiffany in 1998 bought the right to own the Pantone color (tiffany blue) so it can only be used by them and nobody else through the Pantone system.
Only competitor I can think of is NCS. But I don't know if that system is compatible with the printing industry, or if it's just for buildingpaints.
There's also NCS color system, RAL, HKS color systems
19:41 BECAUSE IT'S FUCKIN EXPENSIVE! UNREASONABLY EXPENSIVE! Just convert it in BDT! -_-
My first job was a pressman/delivery boy at a print shop. And seeing the color mixing of inks really took me back. And we had those Pantone color wheels. It was a really fun and therapeutic job, but you had to be precise. Taught me much.
There's no reason any patent should last longer than 50 years.
I worked in the paint department of a hardware store and nothing made me roll my eyes harder than someone walking in with their pantone book. WE CAN'T MAKE PAINT FROM PANTONE CATALOGUES! And trying to explain why was futile. Hardware store paint and printing are not the same thing. Some of the colors can be matched but if they are too vivid then our tinter can't generate a formula because the pigment is getting mixed into a can that is 90 percent binders and solvents. When we scan a color it generates a formula as well as its Delta E which is a measure of the distance between the desired color and the color we can actually make on a map of the color space. Anything below 0.1 is nearly unnoticeable. Anything under 1.0 is "good enough" for most people. When trying to match Pantone colors we often get wild Delta E numbers well over 3.0.
I have worked in a tshirt company for a year we use that book on every shirt.
Time for some competition commission action.
Damn, I hate vocal fry.
The formulas used to mix the primary’s may be reproducible, but the primary’s themselves are often created with elements that are only as pure as they’re refined to be. A “Cobalt Blue” will vary depending on the purity of the cobalt used to create it. This purity can only be developed into a range within a threshold of fractions of a decimal point and is never exactly the same- every refinement will be unique. So, for instance, I can call a color “Cadmium Yellow” if it contains x amount of 99.9x% pure cadmium, but that EXACT value is virtually unreproducible in a factory environment. THEREFORE, the whole thing is really a grift. They’re assigning exact-numbers to a RANGE of values but then pretend they’re all “matching”. The patent should be revoked. Each color is actually a RANGE of colors or pallet that’s “close enough” to then assign a number and patent. There should be a universal system, but it shouldn’t be owned by these clowns in this day and age.
The attitude and lack of defense from the Pantone folks in this video says it all.
It’s not really so much up to designers but print shops. If I send color code in some other code they’d say I’m crazy
As a decorator for over 40 years on the rare occasions I deal with Pantone in relation to decorating it can be a nightmare!! Typically if a client has corporate colours and they relay it to me and I try and find the equivalent colour with a Ral number or in the UK a BS number. On occasion I have had to match the colour with the eye. Strangely one of my very best friends was a printer and he spoke fluent Pantone! Seem to me within printing it works well but trying to relate it to other spheres it can be hit and miss. Also how it relates to car paint can be inconsistent, which also requires the skill of the technician. Who would have ever thought there would be a video about Pantone! That like there being a video about the gestation period of a silk moth!! There is! Wow. 🫣😂
They know they're the only one, so they milk the hell out of their customers… What's new? Typical GREEDY, A**HOLE, corporate type of thing.
This is my fourth year doing studying in a Graphic arts degree, the main thing we do is offset printing, mixing these dense inks is so cool (and hard) everytime.
Who killed Slimer 😥
My favorite color isn’t even a Pantone, it’s RGB 255, 51, 7
I never knew there was a world like this lol