Emirates, KLM & Qantas Vừa Ra Thông Báo Gây Sốc Về Boeing. In a move that stunned the entire aviation industry, Emirates, KLM, and Qantas have each issued shocking new statements regarding their relationship with Boeing. From grounded fleets to canceled orders and rising safety concerns, these announcements could mark a turning point in global air travel.
What went wrong between these top airlines and the aerospace giant? In this video, we break down the explosive updates, explore leaked reports, and analyze what these decisions mean for the future of Boeing — and for passengers worldwide.
✈️ Why is Emirates questioning Boeing’s newest aircraft?
📉 What made KLM reconsider its future orders?
🛑 Why is Qantas drawing a line?
🎥 Watch the full story to uncover what triggered this sudden wave of public backlash — and why other airlines may follow.
#boeing787crash #boeing787 #boeing
Watch the video by DiscoveryQuest
About DiscoveryQuest
Welcome to Amazing Discoveries! Here, you’ll uncover the most fascinating and mind-boggling revelations we’ve encountered. Our videos are brimming with captivating and engaging content that will make you exclaim, “Oh, I never knew that!” From the peculiar and extraordinary to the latest scientific breakthroughs, we’ve got it all.
Video “Emirates, KLM & Qantas Just Made a Shocking Announcement About Boeing” was uploaded on 06/15/2025 to Youtube Channel DiscoveryQuest
Big blow for America, they're full of drama. Nobody will need America anymore.
I boeings sono praticamente delle rane (video).
'Betrayal of trust.' Boeing is going down, big time. A big blow for America, so much for their loud mouths. How many have they killed do far and the call themselves the 'greatest nation in the world,' blah blah.
Very very sad tragedies are still happening in the most advanced industry in the world. This should be the safest transportation way possible…..
On 1 January 2025, 180 people died in a plane crash in Korea. It was still a Boeing, and on the 12th, a Boeing plane crashed in Ahmedabad. 350 of our people died there.
Amen to Boeing.
Safety first…
Fly now – pay Airbus later..
They guarantee your life.
Boeing cannot be trusted
Boeing is a military contractor with the US Government , they had to hire heavy on DEI and not on qualifications . The keystone cop FAA was allowing Boeing to self inspect because , after all , Boeing is the expert . What a fiasco . The CIA runs the FAA , believe it !
In my opinion the AI-171 tragedy is that no one is understanding that the weather at the time were the sole cause of this crash. By weather I mean the following. The temperature at the time were nothing less than 38*C [ in the shade ] and this were exacerbated by low air pressure. This combination is why the perfectly flown and amazingly safe to fly in Boeing 787 Dreamliner flight AI-171 were not able to get off the runway and when it did it were failing to gain altitude. It only lifted off the runway at the very end of the strip. High temperatures make the air less able to give the aircraft the lift needed, and this were further exacerbated by the presence of low air pressure at the time. Although the official [ in the shade ] temperature is given as 38*C in actuality the real temperature in direct sunlight along the runway were probably in excess of 50*C in my opinion. Thus I hold the ATC "Air Traffic Controller" accountable for failing to postpone the flight. Had ATC "the tower" postponed the flight until the weather situation were less obnoxious then this disaster could have been avoided.
I don't think there's ANY doubt that the Air India crash was a massive technical failure of both engines. A 787 is designed to take off even if you're down to one engine. Those two poor pilots died bravely trying to control the plane, but there was nothing they could do. This is a Boeing problem.
I rather not go on holiday or going to a less interesting place, than flying on Boeing.
boycott Boeing
American corporate greed at its best.
This is silly and stupid, we need to look at the facts! Pilot Error? Get the facts! I can understand why Europe would buy Airbus!
"Tredjaydeez" 😂
If its boieng, I am not going
I will make sure when i fly with emiratesit must be an air bus…do afraid with boeing…my last fly was with boeing …
Why all that AI content and robotic voice?
And so with me….i will ask my daughter not to book me on emirates boeing…
Seems like I’ll have a lot of space next time I’m boarding a Boeing 😎
As far as Boeing goes, don't forget it's the manufacturer of the Boeing Chinook CH-47 tandem helicopter introduced into service in 1962. While it's true that most of its users are military services, Wikipedia lists 18 crashes throughout the world since 1962. Many crashes in its early years were in Vietnam with loss of life of US Army personnel. All crashes were due to technical failure, not enemy action. In 1986 a Chinook supplying personnel to North Sea oil rigs, crashed with the loss of all 45 people on board. The helicopter operator stopped using Chinooks for North Sea oil supply operations after that. The June 1994 crash of an RAF Chinook into the Mull of Kintyre was notorious. On board were the cream of British military and civilian intelligence services, including top police and MI5 officers on their way to a security conference in Northern Ireland. There were no survivors. The British Ministry of Defence later tried to blame it on the dead pilots as "pilot error." The pilot in command had tried to warn his superiors that the Chinook was a disaster waiting to happen but had been ignored. It was the Boeing FADECS control software that was the central problem. It was hard for pilots to control and did unexpected things. It transpired that the USAF had grounded its Chinooks while the software was modified following some crashes. The British army and RAF, meanwhile had kept their choppers operational. It was a British journalist at Computer Weekly, Tony Collins# who later took up the cudgels on behalf of the widows and families of the dead pilots, to get justice and compensation as well as an admission that the dead pilots weren't to blame. They partly succeeded, although I don't think the MoD ever took full responsibility. The journalist later won awards for his campaign. Without him, the whole affair would have been swept under the carpet. But Chinook crashes happen regularly to this day, and are always technical failures. The most recent being in 2023 in Australia. While the Chinook helicopter isn't a passenger airliner, where crashes have a much higher media profile, nevertheless Boeing's substandard engineering has cost many lives. The unpredictable FADECS control software scandal also foreshadows the software on the 737 Max. The 737 Max and the 787 aren't Boeing's first rodeo.
# Tony Collins was later involved in breaking other UK government IT scandals like the NHS National Programme for IT, which was a colossal waste of money. American contractors charged vast sums to supply useless and unsuitable software to British hospitals. Collins was also involved, together with Rachel Thomson in the early stages of breaking the Post Office Horizon software scandal. That one has run and run. It has destroyed many lives, bankrupted many postmaster and mistresses and sent innocent people to prison for fraud they never committed, due to faulty central accounting software used by the Post Office. It later spawned a major ITV tv drama.
Apart from their other problems, Boeing will have to deal with tariffs making their products prohibitively expensive.
this is slander…..
If my flight is scheduled with Boeing ,can i declune to boarding. And what will happens with my ticket???
I will appreciate if somebody answer me
From my childhood i already fall in love with Airbus design and look due to twin engine on both side of the wing and now i feel more safer on Airbus, these guys made the right choice by choosing Airbus, well done Airbus.
What you are witnessing now, are the results of a company that has Not and does Not play the Infinite Game in Business, one that prioritizes short-term gains over long-term sustainability, often focusing on winning over competitors rather than contributing to a larger, worthwhile cause. Examples include companies that prioritize short-term profits over ethical considerations, or those that prioritize market share over customer value. These companies are more likely to be driven by a finite mindset, focused on a specific end goal rather than a continuous pursuit of improvement, adaptation and innovation and most times is the death of said company. I'll leave it there, but in summary this was always the expected results as history has repeatedly shown. I feel sorry for the employers. Thanks Kiwi <3 (edit: typos)
Thank You DQ. <3
原因究明もまだ終わっていないのに、どうして機体の欠陥だと決めつけるのでしょうか?
航空機事故の原因で最も多いのはヒューマンエラーです。
あまりにも悪意のある動画です。
🇳🇱オランダは、ハプスブルク家の部下ですね~
ボ━イングは、ロックフェラー家ですね~
東西のバラス維持の為ですか?😅
Not entirely true news
Pride altitude and not want to be subjected to a real control of the expert builders killed Boeing company.
RYANAIR SHOULD FOLLOW !!
best example of how corporate greed is ruining the US
The next President after Trump will have the most destroyed economy ever handed to them.The big switch of Boeing to Airbus was the Trump tariff which finally broke the camels back.
Very right decision. Boeing must not be allowed to play with the lives of passengers snd airlines workers. It has serious faults in designs manufacturing of Boeing 787.
If it's Boening .. I am not going!!
I absolutely refuse to fly now, engines and doors falling off, landing gear coming apart. A relaxing train ride through the Rockies is just fine with me.
Boeing is for the woke mob.
🟣… lo que dicen en este video es falso..!
I like Airbus.
😩😩😩😩😫😫😫😫😫😫😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭
MacDonald Daglas, starting with icon D C 3 lost all credibility by DC 10. Due to faulty engine point. Ispite being powerful aircraft, is used by Bangla Desh or currier services,, not padenge.
Similarly Lockheed after 1011 success , vanished from market.
Case of Boing 737 MAX was hight of negligence and buliein when they refused to accept fort incident of Pilots fighting eithaito pilot, which, due to a faulty sencer, crashed the plane in name of safety.