Allegations mount that anti-aircraft fire hit plane
In a tragic turn of events, a recent plane crash in Kazakhstan has left many questioning the cause behind the disaster. Azerbaijan Airlines Flight 39 was en route from Baku to Grozny in Russia when it abruptly changed course, ultimately crashing just a few kilometers away from Aktau airport in Kazakhstan.
According to sources familiar with the ongoing investigation, it is being speculated that the plane was hit by shrapnel from a Russian surface-to-air missile. This revelation has sparked concerns and raised eyebrows, prompting Russia to urge caution in jumping to conclusions and labeling the incident as mere “hypotheses”.
The crash, which resulted in the loss of many lives, has sent shockwaves across the region and has reignited discussions about air safety and security. The incident serves as a stark reminder of the potential dangers that exist in the skies, especially in conflict-prone areas where tensions can run high.
As authorities delve deeper into the investigation, questions continue to swirl about what exactly caused the tragic crash of Azerbaijan Airlines Flight 39. With mounting allegations of anti-aircraft fire being responsible, the need for a thorough and transparent investigation has never been more pressing.
For the latest developments on this story and more news, visit DW.com.
Watch the video by DW News
Video “Allegations mount that anti-aircraft fire hit plane | DW News” was uploaded on 12/26/2024 to Youtube Channel DW News
Anti aircraft fire
Add it to the list of Putin war crimes.
Crippled by anti aircraft fire
and it only took 48 hours for DW to even mention the possibility of this. seriously, how do you make multiple videos about this plane without addressing the extremely obvious puncture marks all over the aircraft?
Some aviation expert you have there. In military circles, an aircraft damaged by anti-aircraft fire but manages to survive the initial engagement but is destroyed as a consequence of the initial engagement is considered a kill. The pilot or ground crew gets credit for it.
Why did the plane mive so far away from its untended destination
Airplanes full of holes on the back…
04:00 Bizarre that 'aviation journalist' Andreas Spaeth stated that the airplane was not shot down because it was still flyable.
…”an” aviation journalist…
Russia says it was Ukraine and Israel says it was Hamas using it as a missile shield
Pilots gave their best… RIP
Ukraine is going to get the blamed, just wait, You’re going to hear from Lavrov. Putin might have thought Kadyrov was onboard.
Russia urging caution about 'jumping to hypotheses' about the crash, after they immediately blamed the crash on a birdstrike. Everything they say is a lie, they are not worth listening to.
The cause and foundation of the problem is italy and France Paris,Rome,Napolitano,Napoli,America, Rome,Taranto,Torino,Sardegna???,
The rf urges caution before everyone concludes that russia definitely shot this plane down.
They did it back in 2014 so they are the main culprit in my eyes. Still I will wait for further evidence to come to a conclusion.
If the Russians want to be exonerated, they should allow a neutral third party investigation team to do it without interference…. But we know that won't happen… Looks like Russia wants to control the message…
Putin: This theory is full of holes.
Russia refused permission for the plane to land in its country so sent it on to even more peril.
These countries that let Putin trample all over them need to tell him where to go.
In other words: It was definitely shot down, and Russia definitely shot it down…
Russia definitely did it…so sad..the world is fed up with Russia behavior..
All international airlines that still make flights to Russia shall be sued by people for endangering their lives !
Another airlinner shot down bey Russia, who will blame (like the rest) something else. As we all know Putin cares about only Putin the безликий
West…..