On January 28, 1986 NASA lost seven astronauts when a booster engine failed, causing the Shuttle
Challenger to break apart just 73 seconds after launch. But what exactly went wrong during the launch and in the preparations for the big day that led to such a catastrophic failure? Engineers at Morton Thiokol had warned managers not to launch as the “O” rings that sealed off the segments of the boosters might not expand as planned, but they were ignored. Worse still, this problem had been
noticed from the very beginning of the Shuttle problem, but was covered up to give NASA the
commercial edge in sending satellites into space. Seven astronauts died and the Shuttle program
suspended.
Directors: Paul Russel, Andrea Vogt
Watch the video by Best Documentary
Video “Challenger Shuttle Disaster: What Went Wrong? | RARE Footage” was uploaded on 07/29/2025 to Youtube Channel Best Documentary
Roger Boisjoly, an engineer for Morton Thikol, was the solid rocket booster program manager. He was the loudest opponent against launching. He warned months prior to the launch that it was dangerous. He practically begged, and pleaded to the 11th hour. Morton Thikol executives and other top officials overrode him, and the other engineers. He came out and spoke publicly at the hearings in a tell all account, and got black balled for it. His co-workers turned their backs on him.
If it can go wrong it will
The people that knew weren’t important enough to make the call so they were sent by the people at the very top
Why have almost all of these astronauts been found still alive and yes they have been found alive???
And what happened to the criminals who ignored all warnings and ordered the launch? The same ones who took the person who spoke the truth out of his job? Wait, wait, wait! It is the banana republic USA. I know the answer: NOTHING!
When it was rare for rockets to blew up because smart engineers were behind this and not the cybertruck toddler
Allan McDonald was the Challenger. ❤
Did you copy someone else's YouTube vid? You should at least acknowledge this is not an OP…
Skipped school that day to watch this live, cried like a baby.
Why was a guy involved with the shuttle not able to speak English?
The epic shame of all this is the shameless wriggling, wrangling and outright lies told be far too manny executives and such constantly gobbing up the investigation when straight forward honesty would have been the right thing to do. Furthermore, these people properly informed of the danger should have listened and taken the warnings seriously. Knowing the cost of possible failure dictates no dishonesty whatsoever. I have worked in fields where just the smallest act of dishonesty warrented immediate removal and decertification from critical area's. I was once called to respond to an alarm but the engineer refused to let me approach the entity of would even tell me the nature of the error message. Classified, he said. I told him to silence the alarm and note the system down pending. He asked what is wrong with the entity? I told him the system had a loose nut at the control console. Yes, I did get away with it.
In a way they gave their lives to make space travel safer. They may not have known they were doing it but the ultimate result is the same. Do not let them die in vein.
If I screw up at my job and kill people, I may go to jail. Nasa fcks up, wastes excessive money and kills multiple. What happens? Nothing
NASA ignored the warnings of an engineer at McDonnell Douglas about the o-rings
what a garbage design of a rocket, make it one piece
It seems like the people who were flying and building the shuttles were no longer running nasa
Wow , That guy who said (hell he didn't care if shuttle blow up as long as it wasn't his fault), and smiles as he said it is a real asshole. He didn't care who died was long as its not his.
Wish they didst push for the launch as well as the O-ring failing.
Poor Christa McCauliffe. She would have had no idea about the o-rings (most of the crew didn't, except Mike Smith and possibly Scobee and Onizuka) and her first experience of spaceflight is the thing blowing up and then falling to earth (they were alive on the way down)
Reagan. He wanted the shuttle to launch no matter what. He was trying to one up the Russians with his speech.
I lived in Central Florida and used to watch the launches even from there. At my Elementary School we saw the explosion from our classroom window. I've not forgotten the sight of it to this day.
I wonder if that static at just before it blew up was them trying to radio something.
I was 21 in Navy boot camp in Orlando, FL. Our company and others were marching on the grinder when the Challenger disaster happened. All of the recruits and company commanders (a few hundred people) stopped and we were all staring up at the sky for what seemed like forever.
It reminded me of the scene in Shawshank Redemption where all the prisoners are in the yard staring up at the megaphone playing that opera music. After awhile we were dismissed and hung out quietly in the barracks all day. RIP to the Challenger Team ❤️🙏
Ah america, world leader in killing astronauts.
31:50. russia often flies blind in ANY of their aircraft..except 1. 3,5,7, rule.
yiu mean. the STRUCTURAL Failure of NASA to trust engineers, on materials not LAUNCH schedules. 53 °seals and 530 degrees Celsius wasn't enough proof to delay a launch. p r e p o s t e r o u s and GOVT hyperbole !!
They had to figure out what went wrong. They all knew it was the gasket because they were told about not launching in cold weather and they did anyways.
The Space Shuttle was too dangerous a vehicle, far too expensive to operate and never made spaceflight safer and routine. NASA should have not only retired the Shuttle after Challenger but before because it was becoming obvious already by the end of 1985 that the Shuttle would never work as advertised. And NASA should never have allowed non professional astronauts to fly on the Shuttle, because it encouraged people to believe the Shuttle was like a 747 which just happened to fly faster and higher than the jumbo jet.
And as we know the lessons of Challenger were forgotten when the same mistakes that doomed Challenger doomed Columbia as well 17 years later.
And it would have been far safer to launch the Tracking and Data Relay Satellite and the Spartan satellite to study Halley’s Comet on an expendable rocket as well as being far cheaper. The crew members of Chsllrnger lost their lives needlessly and totally unnecessary.
NASA has never recovered really from Challenger and soon, under Trump, the US will hand over leadership in spaceflight to the Chinese. The US will probably never again be dominant in spaceflight and indeed the US may abandon spaceflight altogether, except of course, for military purposes.
And the pressures to launch were obvious, even to those outside the space community. The last flight was postponed 7 times and should never have taken place or postponed because it only carried 1 satellite payload. When it finally did launch, that left barely any time to launch Columbia before a time critical mission in March. I thought those delays meant it was time to retire the Shuttle because a disaster was inevitable if things carried on as they were. And, as we all know, that disaster duly happened, as totally foreseeable and preventable a disaster as could possibly be.
Anything new ?
So as I understand, instead to make the boosters from one piece of steel (or weld it) they built it from many parts and created several weak points with o-rings.
NASA's Incredibly Incompetent Management, especially those appointed by Reagan.