Critics are speaking out against the Canadian government’s proposed changes to air traveller rights regulations, calling the new rules a step backwards for passenger protection. The controversial changes come at a time when airlines’ handling of flight disruptions is under intense scrutiny, particularly during the busy holiday travel season.
Under the proposed regulations, airlines would have more leeway in delaying and cancelling flights without being required to compensate passengers. This has sparked outrage among consumer advocacy groups, who argue that the changes prioritize airlines’ profits over the rights of passengers.
Critics also point to the lack of accountability and transparency in the proposed regulations, which they fear will only lead to more frustration and confusion for travellers. They argue that the government should be prioritizing the protection and rights of passengers, rather than giving airlines free reign to do as they please.
In response to the backlash, the Canadian government has defended the changes, stating that they are necessary to balance the needs of passengers, airlines, and the industry as a whole. However, critics remain unconvinced and are calling for a reevaluation of the proposed regulations.
As the debate continues to unfold, one thing is clear – the issue of air traveller rights regulations is a contentious one that will likely continue to be a hot topic of discussion in the coming months. Airlines will have to tread carefully in navigating this sensitive issue, as the eyes of both passengers and critics alike are watching closely.
Watch the video by Global News
Video “Critics blast Canadian government's proposed changes to air traveller rights regulations” was uploaded on 12/24/2024 to Youtube Channel Global News
I dont flying any more
Canada or Trudeau is slave to climate activists.
The full Super Mario regalia! Mine eyes!!!!! >.>
Trudeau needs to stop controlling people and businesses
Spoiled travellers . It’s a luxury, not a need.
As a pilot or someone who pays really close attention to the industry I would like to ask you, the traveler: Which would you prefer? An aircraft that is safe or an aircraft that is not safe. Forcing airlines to compensate for mechanical is not safe as it could lead to unsafe practices. As a passenger and as a pilot, I would prefer an airline to take a delay over the safety of an aircraft and its passengers and crew than get out on time and something happens in the air. Airline legislation should be left to people who have general knowledge of the industry and how it works before they decide to be even more ruthless and unforgiving to airlines than they already are.
Gábor is incredible! He’s helping so many people through his Facebook group. That group helped me when Air Canada lost our luggage and car seat going to Greece leaving us stranded with nothing for days. It was his group that guided me towards my rights while Air Canada continued to hang up on me when I asked for help on what we should do. Keep advocating Gábor! Your efforts are not going unnoticed!
3 or 4 times a year, I have to make a brief round-trip of 1,200 km each way.
I used to fly. Now I drive.
Payouts and refunds should be automatic. Forcing people to fill out an application is inappropriate.
Europe is so much better….unbelievable how we get fleeced in Canada on everything
Customers have all the rights they need. They have the right not to be so stupid and stop flying for anything but the most urgent and necessary reasons.
More changes government makes your paying higher ticket fees. % of people get messed up effects everyone else.
how many planes have fallen out of the sky just this past year….. how is this the government's fault that yourflight was delayed due to a must have plane repair….. that's on the airline….. the airport is a law unto itself no government in any country has control over the airport…. and your rights other than including refunds on an plane and in the airport is subject to those that operate the airport and its airlines….
Passenger rights? Air Canada would go bankrupt, pronto, if it had to compensate passengers for delays, lost luggage, and cancellations. Neither the Liberals nor the NDP have done anything meaningful about airline passenger rights, so remind their candidates during the next federal election. Of course, Global News cares far more about people who can afford airline travel for their vacations, more so than people who rely on foodbanks for their groceries and cannot find affordable rental housing for their families. Poor people have no rights to complain, eh?