Do LLMs follow the First Amendment?
In the thought-provoking video “Do LLMs Follow the First Amendment?”, free speech scholar Jacob Mchangama explores the profound implications of AI as a mediator of our information landscape. As AI technologies increasingly shape how we access and engage with information, their built-in biases pose significant risks to free speech. Mchangama highlights a compelling experiment where 268 prompts were tested across popular language models (LLMs). The results revealed a troubling trend: many AIs adopted restrictive stances on controversial yet legal speech, raising concerns about censorship in the digital age.
Mchangama emphasizes the importance of ownership and ethical guidelines in the development of AI models. He argues that proprietary models can create choke points that limit the diversity of thought, hindering public discourse. Conversely, the rise of open-source models could empower individuals to tinker with AI technologies, fostering a healthier ecosystem for free expression. This conversation is crucial as we navigate an era where the frontiers of free thought are increasingly mediated by algorithms and corporate interests.
Join Mchangama on this journey to safeguard our freedoms as he advocates for a future where AI can enhance, rather than restrict, our engagement with the world of ideas.
Watch the video by Big Think
Author Video Description
This interview is an episode from @The-Well, our publication about ideas that inspire a life well-lived, created with the @JohnTempletonFoundation.
Subscribe to The Well on YouTube ► https://bit.ly/thewell-youtube
Watch all of Mchangama’s interviews ► https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL_B7bI1QVmJBpGqPZQP1mSFrN1Rfy0CR5
What happens when the technology mediating nearly all our information begins to decide what speech is acceptable?
Free speech scholar Jacob Mchangama warns that AI’s growing role in search, email, and word processing means its hidden biases could shape freedom of thought itself. With his team at the Future of Free Speech, Mchangama ran an experiment that tested 268 prompts against popular LLMs and found that the results often reflected inconsistent standards.
According to Mchangama, this shows why ownership of AI models matters, since their values, incentives, and pressures ultimately shape public access to information.
Read the video transcript ► https://bigthink.com/the-well/when-ai-self-censors/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=video&utm_campaign=youtube_description_bigthink
———————————————————————————-
About Jacob Mchangama:
Jacob Mchangama founded and leads The Future of Free Speech, is a research professor at Vanderbilt, and a Senior Fellow at The Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE). A prolific commentator and author on free speech and human rights, he created the podcast “Clear and Present Danger” and wrote the 2022 book “Free Speech: A History From Socrates to Social Media.”
———————————————————————————-
About The Well
Do we inhabit a multiverse? Do we have free will? What is love? Is evolution directional? There are no simple answers to life’s biggest questions, and that’s why they’re the questions occupying the world’s brightest minds.
Together, let’s learn from them.
Subscribe to the weekly newsletter ► https://bit.ly/thewellemailsignup
———————————————————————————-
Join The Well on your favorite platforms:
► Facebook: https://bit.ly/thewellFB
► Instagram: https://bit.ly/thewellIG
About Big Think
Big Think is the leading source of expert-driven, actionable, educational content — with thousands of videos, featuring experts ranging from Bill Clinton to Bill Nye, we help you get smarter, faster. Get actionable lessons from the world’s greatest thinkers & doers. Our experts are either disrupting or leading their respective fields.
Video “Do LLMs follow the First Amendment?” was uploaded on 11/18/2025 to Youtube Channel Big Think
































umm First
Honestly I think each ai lab is endorsing their reality or path to the future into their ai so pick the company that aligns with your values the most. There are companies who aim at making their ai as unbiased as possible but this itself is a chosen path or character, and this choice itself affects how their ai engages with humans.
The title of this video makes everybody dumber. The first amendment is specifically about the United States government abridging freedom of speech, not corporations having a viewpoint.
And just so we're clear, Citizens United explicitly allows for the later.
AI will be the end of free-thinking.
my wisdom and the wisdom of my family and entire culture is not explained on books, radio, tv, cinema nor in internet, even if they compiled what i wrote in private messages, my wisdom is secret. i am not feeding the AI, i am not teaching.
in my education in the 80's and experience in life i've seen so many things that are considered bad by google, which is the global government. the only way to write the truth is without using internet, but the type writtet or pencil and papel, without digitalizing. without sharing it.
Cant wait until we depend on AI to get an answer for everything….
Hey chat, what should I think about taxes? Who should I vote for? Is abortion right?
It's not a question of whether LLMs follow the 1st amendment, but whether the corporations that control them VIOLANTE the First Amendment.
And the answer is:
Yes.
By colluding with the Federal government, they become proxies of that government and are restricted by the Bill of Rights.
I think it’s necessary to keep in our mind the difference between information, knowledge, understanding and creativity. Why? Human intelligence aligns with divine intelligence whereas artificial intelligence aligns partially with human intelligence (information and knowledge).
This ends up coming across as apologism FOR LLMs,
as you take a single stat out of context to make it sound like they've reduced censorship, when in fact they've increased it.
There are many other ways they censor, like what they leave out of answers to questions.
What a dumb ass title
Who came up with this title?????
Probably not the guy talking.
Not about the 1st ammendment….
In a greedy and corrupt world.. sure 😅
Finite Nature vs Infinite Nature:
Everything naturally occurring is Nature, which includes plants, microorganisms, humans (all lifeforms), atoms, energy, stars, planets, black holes, cancer, AIDS, space, Dreams, and Consciousness.
(Why would Nature be finite?)
Without Infinity, there is only infinite regress; E.g. String Theory: what caused the strings, where did the strings come from, what came before the strings; E.g. The Big Bang: what caused the initial singularity, what came before the initial singularity, etc. Considering "Nothingness" is an obvious fallacy, there must always be Something.
Prove Nothingness, while keeping in mind: Nothingness can only be "proven" in the absence of an observer. If described (observed) by an observer, Nothing becomes something (think hard about this). This would also connote a field of infinite Nothingness randomly formed a spec (our Universe) of somethingness – which is nonsensical.
Provisional science cannot claim authority over reality, at best it can only provide fuzzy hints. Science is a game of "let’s pretend," played with symbols and sensors. Its power lies in utility, not truth. To mistake physics/maths for reality is to worship the finger pointing at the moon.
Our cosmological sciences are akin to a microorganism residing within a human (on Earth), actively exploring the Andromeda galaxy. Our nearly insignificant signals bouncing off of fragments of Infinity – the margins for error are "astronomical".
"So far as the theories of mathematics are about reality, they are not certain; and as far as they are certain, they do not refer to reality" – Albert Einstein
Why would Nature form brains/minds to exhibit consciousness other than to experience reality; considering experiencing reality is the objective of consciousness?
It connotes conscious intent, via consciousness (Nature).
Consciousness/Experiences:
Disneyland (Reality) – Patrons (Consciousness) = Nothingness = Fallacy.
Instead, we Patrons (Nature) are the architects of our own theater called Reality.
All life exists for the sake of experiences (regardless of good/bad).
A thought experiment:
On a plain sheet of paper, draw a single dot (.) in the very center.
The paper represents infinite space. Everything beyond the boundaries of the sheet also represents endless (empty) space.
The dot represents 'The Big Bang'.
Everything humanity is aware of – exists within the dot (our currently expanding universe).
If the observers of this singular dot, zoom far enough away – the dot will cease to exist. The dot will be extinguished through expansion/evaporation – wholly consumed by an infinite void (due to cosmic scales/distances). This would prohibit existence from 'being'. (Yet here we are).
Furthermore this would connote The Big Bang occurred at random, within an infinite void of nothingness – suggesting 'somethingness from nothingness' – which is a fallacy.
Without considering potential forces being exerted upon our reality/universe (from beyond the boundaries of our observations) – is an incomplete interpretation.
Clearly the remainder of the sheet of paper cannot be an infinite void.
The expansion of our universe is accelerating. If our cosmic expansion were occurring within a void, our reality would have concluded before it began (poof). (Yet here we are).
If we are a facet of Infinity – we are Infinity. Along with everything being intimated.
Instead imagine the sheet and everything beyond – riddled with infinite dots.
Every universe is a particle, every particle is a universe.
(Infinity is self-propagating).
Thus Infinity is a superdeterministic preexisting condition.
Infinity being absolute simultaneity.
Expresses infinite probabilities – Deterministically.
Every reality.
Every life.
Is an intended narrative.
(The largest cannot exist without the smallest)
Although our universe is finite (as evidenced by expansion).
Infinity exists at a fixed maximal size, without borders/boundaries: Infinity is forever in every sense, within which infinite universes/realities are housed – each a distinct experience.
(Infinity > Multi)
Infinity accounts for every variation, including variations in thoughts.
Reality is an infinite fractal consciousness; whereby all realities, every possibility, along with every imaginable and unimaginable thing, is a fragment of said consciousness – which we refer to as Nature.
We are Nature.
We are "God" (figurative); fragmented into infinite experiences.
An Infinity without borders or constraints; with infinite energy.
We are all the same entity; existing for the sake of experiences.
Time:
A seemingly endless cadence of day/night cycles, conducted over the course of the Human epoch. Untold billions of Homo Sapiens Sapiens; generation after generation – conditioned by Nature to accept finality. The circadian rhythm, an innate mechanism, a constant reminder; consciousness an ephemeral experience, fleeting with every moment, through every exhalation. Selene a blanket of night, engulfing all into her dreamy embrace – the analog of Stella, raining rays of warmth, nourishing existence into being; beckoning the vivacity of life to stir yet again.
Day into night, night into day – a rhythm to remind us that none of Natures constructs are created without an expiry. Whether measured by 6.62607004 × 10-34 m2 kg / s; or by a Supereon, we are cascading energies, propagating our collective experiences – vainly attempting to elicit a sense of ‘self’ in hopes of staving off oblivion. Not realizing that the only allowable paradox to exist, is existence; a lucid dream conducted by the everlasting artistry of Gaia.
Time.
—
the Alchemist
-Ø1
can i sue an llm. it was mean to me…
Private companies can regulate speech and are not bound by free speech rights. Get this straight and stop misleading people. Free speech is from the government restricting speech not private companies. Would you want to start a company and have people say anyone can say whatever they want inside your business. No I think not. But if you create a website or have a brick and mortar store you can definitely tell your customers what they can and cannot say in your guidelines of use or while they are inside your business. Sadly people get free speech wrong.
They don’t thank you
For the back of the class: the only entity that can violate the first amendment is the government itself.
If you're on the turf (real or virtual) of a private citizen or company, yes, they can exercise their property and contractual rights to control your speech, or their AI's.
Does the government?
Good work
Not sure if you've been following the country that has this constitution and the recent activities that answer this question…. It just words on some old piece of paper that no reads and is a it of an incinvieniene. Means nothing other than good TV line and Movie fantasy it turns out.
Lol anyone here know about YT censorship powered by AI? It’s insane.