In a recent episode of “60 Minutes,” Bill Whitaker sat down with Vice President Kamala Harris and Governor Tim Walz, the Democratic ticket in the 2024 presidential election, for in-depth interviews. The interviews provided viewers with a closer look at the two political figures who could potentially lead the country in the future.
During the interviews, Harris and Walz spoke on a range of important topics, from their plans for the economy and healthcare to their visions for the future of the United States. Harris, who made history as the first female, Black, and South Asian Vice President, shared insights into her leadership style and priorities as the second-in-command.
On the other hand, Governor Tim Walz discussed his experience as a leader in Minnesota and his ambitions for the country if elected as Vice President. Both Harris and Walz displayed their knowledge, expertise, and passion for serving the American people, offering viewers a glimpse into what a potential Democratic administration could look like.
With “60 Minutes” being known for its hard-hitting investigative reports and in-depth interviews, the episode featuring Harris and Walz did not disappoint. The interviews shed light on the Democratic ticket’s plans and priorities, making it a must-watch for those interested in politics and the future of the United States.
To watch the full interviews and stay updated on all things “60 Minutes,” be sure to subscribe to their YouTube channel and follow them on social media. Don’t miss out on the opportunity to gain valuable insights from these two influential political figures.
Watch the video by 60 Minutes
About 60 Minutes
“60 Minutes,” the most successful television broadcast in history. Offering hard-hitting investigative reports, interviews, feature segments and profiles of people in the news, the broadcast began in 1968 and is still a hit, over 50 seasons later, regularly making Nielsen’s Top 10.
Video “More from Kamala Harris and Tim Walz's 60 Minutes interviews” was uploaded on 10/08/2024 to Youtube Channel 60 Minutes
She's in office now. What are her accomplishments? The worst approval rating and worst performance in history? Who is foolish enough to vote for her? We need the fixer back in office to clean up this disaster
*Plaintiff:* John Doe
*Defendant:* 60 Minutes
*Jurisdiction:* State of New York, County of Manhattan
*Court:* Supreme Court of the State of New York
*Complaint:*
*Introduction*
1. This is an action for defamation, misrepresentation, and fraudulent editing against 60 Minutes for the deliberate and malicious editing of an interview with Vice President Kamala Harris to alter the context and substance of her statements, portraying her in a misleadingly favorable light.
*Parties*
2. Plaintiff, John Doe, is an individual who watched the interview aired on 60 Minutes and was misled into believing that Vice President Kamala Harris made statements that she did not, in fact, make.
3. Defendant, *60 Minutes*, is a widely known television program owned and operated by CBS News, with principal offices in New York, New York.
*Jurisdiction and Venue*
4. This Court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to New York Civil Practice Laws and Rules because Defendant operates its business within New York.
5. Venue is proper in this Court because the events giving rise to the claim occurred in this jurisdiction.
*Factual Background*
6. On October XX, 2024, 60 Minutes aired an interview with Vice President Kamala Harris.
7. Upon information and belief, the interview was heavily edited to remove certain portions of her responses and alter the sequence of her answers, which created a false impression that she was more coherent, consistent, and articulate than she was in the original interview.
8. The editing was not merely done for time constraints but was specifically designed to present an inaccurate representation of the Vice President’s views and statements.
9. The public, including Plaintiff, relied on the integrity of the unedited broadcast as an accurate reflection of the Vice President’s statements, thereby creating a false and misleading narrative.
*Claims for Relief*
*Count I: Defamation by Implication*
10. Plaintiff incorporates by reference the preceding paragraphs.
11. The manner in which Defendant edited and presented the interview implied facts about the Vice President that were not true, thereby defaming her by implication.
12. Defendant’s actions were reckless and malicious, as they knew or should have known that heavily editing the interview would create a false impression.
13. As a result of Defendant’s defamatory conduct, the public, including Plaintiff, was misled, and Plaintiff was harmed by being presented with false information under the guise of truth.
*Count II: Misrepresentation*
14. Plaintiff incorporates by reference the preceding paragraphs.
15. Defendant knowingly and intentionally altered the interview, which misled the public, including Plaintiff, into believing Vice President Kamala Harris made statements in a certain context or with a certain meaning that was not true.
16. Plaintiff relied on this misrepresentation to form opinions and make decisions, believing the statements aired were true and accurate, causing harm.
*Count III: Fraudulent Editing*
17. Plaintiff incorporates by reference the preceding paragraphs.
18. Defendant fraudulently edited the interview to materially alter the nature of Vice President Kamala Harris’s statements to benefit her public image, knowing that doing so would deceive the audience.
19. As a direct result of this fraudulent editing, Plaintiff was misled and suffered emotional distress from being exposed to false and altered content.
*Prayer for Relief*
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for the following relief:
1. Compensatory damages for defamation and misrepresentation, in an amount to be determined at trial;
2. Punitive damages for the reckless and malicious editing of the interview;
3. An injunction against Defendant, prohibiting further misleading editing practices;
4. Attorney's fees and costs; and
5. Any other relief the Court deems just and proper.
*Dated:* October XX, 2024
*Respectfully submitted,*
[Signature]
John Doe
WAlz made more sense.🎯
What a joke what a joke both of them are jokes and, Harris and Obama and you know they're all jokes all the Democrats they're all jokes we want the Republican Republican Republican Trump trump Trump trump Trump trump
This whole interview shows how disgraceful reporters are these days
bad
democrats bad
60 minutes, once idolized, now looked down upon for altering an interview. 60 minutes black balled itself.
Obamas brother has endorsed Trump !!
The amazing editing is sad. They put words in her mouth especially when they don't fit they will show the back of her head
We want to see the full interview 🤔
They edited out her answers. 60 minutes, you are evil
I don’t care if you are offended but, you must be a nincompoop to even consider voting Kamala as a US president. Your hatred for Trump will lead to the destruction of your country.
really makes you wonder what 60 min. actually hides from us. They cant show us the real FULL 60 minutes of kamala then what have they not shown a real full 60 minutes on other people about?
Why would trump go on 60 minutes when they're gonna alter what he says change it just like they did with kamala
And see they're lying they took Biden out because they didn't think Biden could beat trump. Stop lying
She's never been a governor she's never owned a company of her own why is she qualified to be president she's not
Say she's lying again she accused trump of being a dictator that's not creating violence right
And where did Iran And where did Iran get money to build a nuclear weapon Biden Harris thank you very much Obama
Just Just notice everybody's wearing American pin American flag pin but her
Her answers make 0 sense.
Would have been a good interview had CBS not edited Kamala's answers so deceivingly
The editing is deceitful.
He ask some good questions…but he did not push back on bs…not much. Plus the editing was unethical.
Japan stand with Taiwan!!!
It’s national security for Japan right now….
❤😂🎉😢😮😮😅
Anyone that votes for this administration again is a idiot
I demand tRump publish his tax records like every other president before him & his health records from an actual doctor–one with a license and not demoted Ronny Jackson who lost his admiral status
Kamala and Walz would be a total and complete disaster for the United States. The illegals come to this country to get away from tyranny, and have and enjoy freedom, opportunity for advancement, peace of mind, if these two are elected it would be worse than Red China, Russia or any country in Central and South America. Its illegal to vote if you are not a citizen of the United States, don't end up in jail.
Never watching 60 Minutes again. You're obviously biased. Bye.
We ALL want to see the transcript. We're tired of "Trump bad" as a response to us calling out media bias. No, if you want to retain respect, release the transcript. If you don't we all know where you stand…not journalists, just media "sm"ores.
Release the unedited transcript and video. Stop lying. Stop interfering in the election.
these clowns should never be anywhere near the government let alone the Whitehouse. case in point the whole world is on fire after just 4 years of her type of "leadership". I really hope this election ends both of these p.o.s. political careers. then there will be real hope for this country . we're doomed if they win
Release the unedited Harris transcript.if you gave nothing to hide?
Nobody wants this lying and incompetent lady Trump 2024!!!
This is a joke.. pivot to objectivity before it’s too late..
While I agree Bill Whitaker did a decent job. He could of done way more, and way more rebuttals from Kamala side. He did better than the last 5-6 interviews she has done. But far less than prior presidents.
The two most pathetic politicians in American history.
I wont follow her
The question is HOW TO LESSEN THE TEMPERATURE..OMG KAMALA
Bill Whitaker did a commendable job interviewing Harris and Walz. He must be highly upset that these 6 minutes are what made it to this clip. He asked some tough questions for good reason. 60 minutes has edited the real answers and made the full responses difficult to find.
60 minutes is disgraceful. Whitaker could easily find a job with a news organization that has some integrity, assuming there are any that still exist.
Fn gross
Garbage