How Russia’s Nuclear Deployment in Belarus Threatens NATO
In a strategic maneuver that has sent ripples through Europe and beyond, Russia is redeploying its nuclear capabilities into neighboring Belarus. This move significantly increases the presence of tactical nuclear arms at NATO’s doorstep, eliciting deep concerns among member states and undermining global non-proliferation efforts.
The video “How Russia’s Nuclear Deployment in Belarus Threatens NATO” from The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) offers a detailed examination of the implications of this escalation. Beginning with an overview of the historical context surrounding nuclear arms in Belarus, the narrative unfolds to reveal the growing stakes involved.
Historically, Belarus was once home to a substantial arsenal of Soviet nuclear weapons, which were removed in the 1990s following the dissolution of the USSR. The return of nuclear arms to Belarus signals a stark shift in regional security dynamics. Russia’s assertion that this deployment mirrors NATO’s own nuclear-sharing agreements raises troubling questions about the future of arms control and diplomacy in Europe.
At the core of this deployment is Russia’s strategy to enhance its deterrent capabilities. By stationing nuclear arms in Belarus, Moscow aims to assert its influence in Eastern Europe while simultaneously sending a clear message to NATO about its readiness to counter perceived threats. This decision, framed as a response to NATO’s posturing, further complicates an already tense security environment.
Europe’s reaction is one of palpable concern. The saber-rattling between NATO and Russia amplifies fears of an arms race on the continent. The potential for miscalculation or escalation in this heated atmosphere underscores the fragility of peace and stability in the region. As countries grapple with the implications of this heightened nuclear presence, the urgency for dialogue and diplomatic solutions becomes increasingly apparent.
In this pivotal moment, the WSJ’s Coordinates segment delves into the geopolitics shaping military strategies across the globe. The deployment not only threatens European security but also raises critical questions regarding the efficacy of global non-proliferation efforts, as the world watches to see how Western powers will respond to this bold escalation by Russia and Belarus.
As the situation unfolds, the risks involved in nuclear brinkmanship remain significant, leaving many to wonder what the future holds for security and cooperation in a world where the specter of nuclear conflict looms larger than ever.
Watch the video by The Wall Street Journal
Video “How Russia’s Nuclear Deployment in Belarus Threatens NATO | WSJ Coordinates” was uploaded on 12/03/2025 to Youtube Channel The Wall Street Journal


































NOT smart and NOT good people at the top are getting us closer and closer to world war 3.
New Zealand house price skyrocket
What about the USA in eu
Well usa share nukes with European countries so why can't Russia
Everything threatens NATO, but nothing threatens Russia. Every Ukrainian missile kills only russian soldiers, no civilians, but every Russian missile kills only civilians and no soldiers.
Kinda hypocritical don't ya think? NATO countries like Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania have nukes pointed directly at Russia.
I don’t understand why Ukraine has not attacked the mother land. They need to attack Moscow and make its citizens flee into the subways. Russia has left Moscow open to invasion.
NATO weak organizations
Könnte man die Drohne Flügel nicht nutzen, um da Sprengstoff oder Ähnliches rein zu machen oder der ganze Flügel ein Sprengstoff ist
Prior to 2022, Russia most likely deployed nuclear warheads in Ussuriysk and Chita to deter major cities in Northeast China.
So? USA got plenty of nukes in euro countries.
So it’s now a problem when Russia decide to copy USA actions 😂😂😂
NATO's eastwards march is the main reason of this war
Hypocrite. US share nuclear weapons with 5 EU country so its fine for Russia to do the same with its allies.
* without decades and decades of critical core weapons maintenance making tactical weapons basically dirty at best and ICBM's delivery vehicles sketchy at best if they can launch or catastrophically fail from hydrogen embrittlement
Russia is right
The US cannot in clear conscience deploy its Nukes (on another continent by the way) surrounding Russia and expect the ruskies not to defend themselves and do the same are you kidding me 😂thats Universal hypocrisy
Now we know the World is a dog eat dog place and does not run on Morality or Law but still
SU-25 is NOT a fighter aircraft it is an ATTACK AIRCRAFT/plane. Is it really that hard at times for well established news organizations to get small but important information correct?
Western capitals and other important facilities cs the Oresynik and kinzell missiles 😂😂😂
And NATO has not placed any nukes or ballistic missiles in Eastern Europe, in order not to threaten Russia. And Russia puts them on NATO's border pointing all over Europe, while whining about "security threats" from NATO. Russian leaders are the worst hypocrites and liars.
We won't give back Ukraine's nukes and not welcome to NATO, but accept nukes in a new totalitarian country next to the EU ))) pathetic…
Dear world citizens, when are you going to learn russia can't never be trusted?
Sharing nukes with other countries like kids loaning a friend their bike. What could possibly go wrong?
Your hypocrisy is laughable 😂
US deployes nukes is fine. 🥰
How dare other countries does the same 😡
We're all doomed. Good decision donnie smh
Correction uk does not have an independent nuclear missile deterrent
Putin is making Belarus nuclear capable so when they invade Lithuania through Belarus nato won’t be able to dispose of lukashenko without the threat of his Russian nukes
Belarus isn’t a sovereign nation