Where Americans Go if They Believe They’ve Suffered a Rare Vaccine Injury | 60 Minutes
In an era where vaccinations are pivotal in protecting public health, it’s essential to acknowledge that, despite their overwhelming benefits, adverse effects can occur—but these cases are exceedingly rare. The latest episode of “60 Minutes” delves into the complex and often misunderstood realm of vaccine-related injuries and the recourse available to those affected.
In this compelling segment, viewers will explore how Americans who believe they have suffered a vaccine injury can seek justice through a specialized legal system known as vaccine court. This unique court, established to address claims of vaccine-related harm, plays a crucial role in providing relief and compensation for individuals facing unexpected health challenges post-vaccination.
Join us as we uncover the stories of those navigating this challenging process and hear from experts who explain the intricacies of vaccine safety and the legal avenues available. This episode not only highlights the importance of vaccinations in saving lives but also sheds light on the rare circumstances where individuals feel they may be harmed.
As “60 Minutes” continues to deliver hard-hitting investigative reporting, this episode shines a light on a critical aspect of public health that often goes unnoticed. Don’t miss out on this informative exploration—watch now and stay informed.
For further insights and to catch up on more investigative stories, subscribe to the “60 Minutes” YouTube channel and follow us on social media for updates.
Watch the video by 60 Minutes
About 60 Minutes
“60 Minutes,” the most successful television broadcast in history. Offering hard-hitting investigative reports, interviews, feature segments and profiles of people in the news, the broadcast began in 1968 and is still a hit, over 50 seasons later, regularly making Nielsen’s Top 10.
Video “Where Americans go if they believe they've suffered a rare vaccine injury | 60 Minutes” was uploaded on 10/06/2025 to Youtube Channel 60 Minutes

































Not rare
No juries, special judges called “masters”…drug companies aren’t even present and have zero liability. If that’s not the definition of a special interest, rigged game I don’t know what is.
If they find a direct cause, then it should be compensated.
A direct cause.
Rare?
My son has severe non-verbal autism. He was exceeding his milestones until 6 months, and everything went downhill. There's no family history on either side with Autism. I did take Tylenol while pregnant and gave it to him early on in his life. I listened to his doctor and did all his vaccinations on time.
My son was the quietest and happiest boy until his 6mo schedule shots. I remember how he cried all day after his appointment and his personality never been the same since. He is now 15.. if there is no “severe” reaction like they show in this video, that doesn’t mean there are millions of mild injuries, which make a huge impact on each of those people..
CBS is over! It’s now own by a foreign country😢
These comments are full of crazy people. Enjoy Bari!
60 MINUTES, WORTHLESS. CAN'T EVEN REMEMBER WHEN IT WAS UNBIASED JOURANALISM.
So I guess the “news” pieces will now reflect the new helm approved by 45.
People need to stop bringing politics into everything. 60 minutes is just showing that sometimes things happen for good or bad.
My son had the same vaccine at 6 month of age my husband suggested to take him to his pediatrician and I refused! We took him to #Children’s_hospital in WASHINGTON DC! The Neurologist told us” your son is very lucky to have his mother who brought him to the CHILDREN’S HOSPITAL “ Our son is the healthiest man today! Thank you GOD!
People are worried about
vaccines after the WuhanLab and Dr Fauci got together.
🤣🤣 60 minutes. Promoting the Dictators agenda of fear mongering. 🤡
Wow. A lawyer who does something VERY POSITIVE
Great story
This is good policy all around. What they said is true: it is better to compensate somebody who may not have been injured than to risk missing somebody who was injured.