As the United States gears up for what promises to be a pivotal presidential election, the stark divide between the two main candidates, Kamala Harris and Donald Trump, is underscored by the contrasting visions they present for the country. With each offering a vastly different path forward, the outcome of this election holds significant implications not only for how Americans see themselves, but also for how the nation is perceived on the global stage.
According to Lawrence Douglas, a law professor at Amherst College, the relevance of individual states in this election is a topic of contention. He asserts that out of the 50 states in the Union, only seven hold sway in determining the outcome, rendering the majority of states essentially “irrelevant.”
This assertion underscores the intense focus on key battleground states, such as Pennsylvania, Florida, and Michigan, where candidates traditionally concentrate their efforts in order to secure crucial electoral votes. The disproportionate influence of these swing states has prompted criticism regarding the efficacy of the electoral system, which some argue fails to accurately reflect the popular will of the American people.
With the election season reaching its climax, the stakes are higher than ever as voters are confronted with a decision that will shape the trajectory of the nation for years to come. As the world watches closely, the ramifications of this election are sure to reverberate both domestically and internationally, making the outcome of paramount importance for the future of the United States.
Watch the video by FRANCE 24 English
Video “US presidential election: '43 of the 50 states are irrelevant' • FRANCE 24 English” was uploaded on 10/27/2024 to Youtube Channel FRANCE 24 English