The ongoing conflict between Ukraine and Russia has escalated once again, with Ukraine considering the use of long-range weapons to defend against attacks from Russian territory. President Zelenskyy is pushing for the deployment of missiles like the British Storm Shadows and American ATACMs to target air bases and launch sites in Russia. However, Ukraine’s Western allies are hesitant to support this strategy, as it could provoke a strong response from Moscow.
The question at the center of this debate is whether providing Ukraine with long-range weapons will cross Putin’s red line and prompt a dangerous escalation. Some believe that such a move could lead to retaliation from Russia, possibly including the supply of long-range missiles to other groups like Yemen’s Houthis. The fear of Russian backlash is causing hesitation among Western allies, despite the urgent need for Ukraine to defend itself against ongoing incursions in Donetsk and the Kursk Oblast.
It is clear that time is of the essence in this situation, as prolonged discussions and delays in providing aid to Ukraine only give Russia more opportunities to advance its goals. The Western world must apply more pressure on Putin to come to the negotiation table and prevent further escalation of the conflict. Military production capacity is also a factor to consider, as Russia may be outproducing the West in terms of weaponry.
The debate on whether to arm Ukraine with long-range weapons highlights the deep divisions among Western allies and the challenges in coordinating a unified response. Some allies are hesitant to support Ukraine due to domestic political considerations, while others advocate for a more aggressive approach. The risk of Russian retaliation, potentially including the use of tactical nuclear weapons, adds another layer of complexity to the situation.
Overall, the decision to provide Ukraine with long-range weapons must be made carefully, with a clear strategic objective in mind. The urgency of the situation calls for swift action and a united front from Western allies to ensure the safety and security of Ukraine in the face of Russian aggression.
Watch the video by DW News
Video “Long-range weapons for Ukraine: Putin’s red line? | To the Point” was uploaded on 09/19/2024 to Youtube Channel DW News
Biden has said no to this. He has also said the US will not participate in a conflict with Lebanon or Iran as desired by Netanyahu.
The west must supply Ukraine with what they need to stop the war ,and at the same time gives Russia a ultimatum straight out ,
Nato is wanting to fire their Long Range missiles on Russia from Ukraine soil …
why can't they fire these missiles from their own soil ? Do they fear Russia's wrath ..?
Nato fires their missiles from Ukraine but Ukrainians die in the devastating retaliatory action of Russia …
Sad …
V
Imagine if European NATO countries didn't skirt their responsibilities, they might have enough materiel to aid Ukraine and this war wouldn't have lasted as long.
Ukraine just does what the US allows 🙂 This is the independence of Ukraine
US is using Ukraine as a bait to wage economic war against Europe.
The Europeans are so blind to see the facts
Let them fight back!
@AtticaBlue1 you are right. if russia can arm itself from NK and Iran, why shouldn't Ukraine? but also Iran and North Korea should not be barred from arming themselves from Russia and China. Imagine how happy kim would be to own some of those Iskanders. how about few mig 31, and su35s for Iran? do you think the Ayatollah would mind having some S400s guarding Tehran?
Today West gives Ukraine long range missiles and tomorrow they may give Nuclear missiles also …
where is the end ??
It seems Nato is using Ukraine as proxy ?
Don't talk stupidly. Long-range missiles can only increase the damage and escalation of hostilities.
this war is American and UK not Uropain …! to take 12 trilen property of Ukrain .but Ukraine lose the teritory and people .
The greatest weapon the west have employed over the years ,is deception and it is used worldwide. They have used it a lot in the Middle East where countries there blames Israel for everything that happens to them . This is effect gives Israel capabilities that they do not possess and the real actors remain blameless. In my opinion if the Israelis do not admit to an act they did not do it , but they know who did it and why. In Ukraine The west is the one actually attacking Russia since February when Ukraine was told not to sign the peace deal and continue fighting. The Ukrainian attacks are mere pinpricks and every serious destruction of Russian assets are done by NATO forces with no assistance from Ukrainians. I am sure Russia knows this but continue to go along with narratives like Ukrainian long range drones and missiles so my question is why? I believe the war would finish after Russia strikes a NATO asset openly because no one one wants to die whatever they may say in meetings and gatherings.
Europe learnt nothing over the last 10 decades. I’m sure they will this time thanks to Uncle Sam.
The West has no spine. Afraid to throw the book at Putin, just throw the entire bookshelf at him. His redlines are bluff. Always has been.
Red line hahaha
quite good show, missing lot in show
In the West, they come up with red lines for themselves and violate them themselves in the hope of a nuclear war.
The restrictions are just an excuse for pointless escalation. Russia was content to use glide bombs and artillery until Ukraine shelled Kursk. Ukraine was already using drones on Russian territory so this is just an excuse to involve US and UK space recon assets for unmanned targeting. These will do nothing to stop the advance on the eastern front with infantry and IFVs, it'll only damage Russia, sure, but leave Ukraine vulnerable to more intense strikes. If they use a H-bomb on Kyiv, NATO is not going to activate article 5 for a non-member. The Ukrainians are in panic mode.
P—n is threatening to use more severe weapons on Kyiv,in particular. However, he will NEVER use nuclear weapons. He knows he will immediately be killed as would Moscow and all his regime. Another bluff. Do not give in. to this monster.
Using western missiles involves NATO technicians and NATO satellites targeting and launching NATO missiles. Directly in war against Russia?
But it's not our fight… If it is then we are part of the conflict
Awesome analysis and discussion
Before the war Ukrainians had long range missile
It wont. Word is Russia will level DC Avanguard Hypersonic miss…..
A lot of nonsense spoken😊
these guys are a bunch of warmongers. We need Ukraine to be neutral. we do not need them in NATO. There was no threat to EU from Russia. Now thanks to USA warmongers we are close to war. Russia will not be defeated (because if they are defeated, they will use nukes) so how do we win? we do not. Stop this war.
Dictators understand only language of power. Give Ukraine this power to survive and win
Putin's red lines? Ukraine crossed all these redlines and nothing has happened. Ukraine occupied even Russia. So why Putin is not doing anything? Yes, you guess it: he is lying and bluffing like always and people in the west believe these lies. If Ukraine destroys with long-range weapons the Kerch bridge, russian (rail line) bridges around Ukraine, the ammo dumps, air bases and fuel lines, the 500000 Russian soldiers would be cut off suplies and would have to retreat. It so simple
Deliberate escalation.
Leopard, Abrahams , F16
Now long range missiles , Good luck
Russian submarines are off the coast of England on standby. Ukraine must stop the madness and negotiate a peace agreement.