After 11 days of intense fighting, a ceasefire between Israel and Hezbollah has been reached and is currently underway in Lebanon. The agreement, which was confirmed by US President Joe Biden, has brought a temporary halt to the violence that has claimed the lives of hundreds of people and displaced thousands more.
Despite the ceasefire being in place, there are many concerns about its sustainability and the huge gap between the promises made and the reality on the ground in Lebanon. The agreement calls for a cessation of hostilities and the opening of humanitarian corridors to provide aid to those in need, but there are already reports of violations and continued fighting in some areas.
The shaky nature of the ceasefire is highlighted by the fact that it is a unilateral agreement between Israel and Hezbollah, with no involvement from the Lebanese government or other international actors. This raises questions about the long-term prospects for peace in the region and whether this ceasefire can hold without broader support.
Many observers are also skeptical about the ability of the international community to enforce the terms of the ceasefire and ensure that both parties adhere to their commitments. Previous ceasefires in the region have been fragile and short-lived, leading to concerns that this latest agreement may not be any different.
As the situation in Lebanon remains uncertain, it is clear that there is still a long way to go before lasting peace can be achieved in the region. The ceasefire may be a step in the right direction, but without a comprehensive and sustainable solution to the underlying issues, the cycle of violence and conflict is likely to continue.
Watch the video by Al Jazeera English
Video “Ceasefire in Lebanon shaky, huge gap between promises and reality: Analysis” was uploaded on 11/27/2024 to Youtube Channel Al Jazeera English