President Donald Trump has made his stance on tariffs well-known, often citing the 25th President, William McKinley, as an inspiration for his own tariff policies. McKinley, known for his “McKinley Tariffs,” implemented some of the largest tariff hikes in U.S. history. However, in a surprising turn of events, McKinley changed his mind in his second term and began advocating for more free international trade as a way to boost the U.S. economy.
The Wall Street Journal delves into the complexities of McKinley’s tariff policies, drawing parallels to President Trump’s strategies and shedding light on why McKinley ultimately abandoned his own tariff policy. The video breaks down key chapters in McKinley’s tariff journey, touching on topics such as revenue, restriction, and reciprocity.
McKinley initially embraced tariffs as a way to generate revenue for the government and protect American industries. However, he later realized that high tariffs could lead to retaliatory measures from other countries, limiting U.S. exports and hurting the economy. This realization prompted McKinley to shift towards advocating for reciprocal trade agreements and more open international trade.
The video also explores how President Trump is following a similar playbook to McKinley, with his emphasis on tariffs as a tool to protect American jobs and industries. However, it raises questions about the long-term effectiveness of this strategy and the potential consequences of escalating trade tensions.
In a fascinating historical comparison, the video sheds light on McKinley’s evolution on tariffs and the lessons that can be learned from his change in stance. As the debate over tariffs continues to unfold in today’s political landscape, understanding the complexities of past tariff policies can provide valuable insights into the challenges and opportunities of international trade.
Overall, the exploration of McKinley’s tariff legacy offers a thought-provoking analysis of the evolving nature of trade policies and the potential implications for the U.S. economy. As history continues to inform present-day decisions, the video serves as a timely reminder of the complexities and nuances of trade relations in a globalized world.
Watch the video by The Wall Street Journal
Video “Why Trump’s Tariff Idol, McKinley, Abandoned His Own Tariff Policy | WSJ” was uploaded on 02/04/2025 to Youtube Channel The Wall Street Journal
Not quite understanding whats wrong with a surplus of tax revenue 2:10
You're not really rich unless you can afford a legion.
It’s worth a shot! We need to get creative and get America out of debt. Take care of our US citizens. Protect our borders. Gain more resources where we don’t need to depend on countries who’ve been mistreating USA with tariffs.
Trump fumbling over history taken out of context to try to build policy based on the economics of America 150 years ago really exemplifies the idea that this isn't a real policy. It will be used as an excuse to cut corporate and income taxes while ensuring that the deficit will, at best, stay the same. All while the cost of goods goes up and disproportionately puts the burden on the poor.
Very well explained . Good job giving the pros and cons of all options
He meant that him and his friends are going to be even richer.
How can a revenue SURPLUS be such a problem? I don't get it. This video describes it as if it's such an undesirable 'problem'. If the govt has a SURPLUS of money, isn't it a BOON? It means that the government can invest in other things, like infrastructure, or improving social services, or cutting taxes. How on earth can the WSJ describe this as a 'problem'?
WSJ Globalists are freaking out
If tariffs are so bad, why did the last administration leave the tariffs on China that Trump put on them during his first term?
Tariffs = terrible tulips
I love paying import tariffs and passing them on to the average consumer! (No we can't make stuff here overnight.)
The Wall Street Journal’s dismissal of Trump’s tariffs as “the dumbest trade war” ignores their strategic leverage in reshaping North American trade and security. Far from reckless protectionism, the policy has already pressured Mexico to deploy troops against fentanyl trafficking and incentivized trade shifts that align with U.S. interests. These tariffs are not just economic penalties but a calculated effort to force concessions on critical issues like immigration, drug enforcement, and manufacturing imbalances.
Beyond diplomacy, tariffs serve a broader goal—reducing U.S. reliance on foreign supply chains and reviving domestic industries. With 42% of auto parts sourced from Mexico, targeted tariffs encourage reshoring, strengthening states like Michigan and Ohio. Selective rates, such as a 10% tariff on Canadian energy versus 25% on other goods, further reveal a nuanced strategy protecting key sectors without fully severing trade ties. This push for economic sovereignty is a response to vulnerabilities exposed by global crises, ensuring long-term resilience over short-term economic discomfort.
Critics who champion free trade often ignore its failures, from stagnant wages to the U.S.’s $180 billion trade deficit with Canada and Mexico. Just as Trump’s 2018 steel tariffs led to USMCA negotiations that strengthened labor protections, these tariffs could force necessary reforms. Markets, too, have proven adaptable, with initial stock market dips stabilizing as businesses adjust.
Labeling this strategy as simply “dumb” oversimplifies a complex, high-stakes negotiation. The real question isn’t whether tariffs cause disruption—they always do—but whether that disruption secures lasting economic and security advantages. If it does, then the short-term pain is a price worth paying.
Fascinating segment! Difficult to conceive of a universe where a surplus was a problem. Might have to pick up that guy's book. Good work WSJ!
Why? he was assassinated, that's why.
Interesting twist, McKinley abandoned his own policy! 🤔
I hope McKinley and the 3rd Anti-Christ, the Lord of the Lies, etc have one other thing in common, also.
The traitor needs to be impeached, removed, imprisoned for life!
Trump reading on his teleprompter is so lifeless!
Well now we know where Trump gets his idea. Again, the intelligence of a 3-year old. Takes an idea and runs with it without thinking it through. Its a different era now. Completely different! And as the economist analysts are saying, you can not have all three benefits at the same time. Also couldn't help wonder if the same fate will befall Trump that happened to his hero. At the rate things are going at this moment, could well happen. Time will only tell.
So Trump is mackinley in reverse…
Look Trump is ignorant and in cognitive decline but he is not totally stupid. He knows his supporters are either super rich or super ignorant so he is playing to them. What he calls the art of the deal is more “The art of the scam”. Good luck America.
McKinley actually supported tariffs throughout his presidency, even before assassination. He wanted to protected vitally important industries but also open up to foreign markets for economic growth. Trump wants to see this. Wall Street just has a free trade fetish
Ha problem is Trump never finish the ahh book 😅 wait till sees how it ended 😅 🍊 😊
Dump Trump. 😢
and he wants US to produce like in the late 1800s and early 1900s? with such a high cost of working wage? the factories are not gonna go up and stay competitive.
Honestly with all that chaos and instability created by Trump,
what reason would any business have to stay in the US not to mention to invest into it?
Trump pauses tariffs on Mexico, Canada for a month, but his threats spooked almost everyone: https://on.wsj.com/40NbqLQ