Should we bring extinct species back to life? | DW Documentary
All around the world, scientists are working to recreate lost animal species such as the mammoth. Using modern genetic techniques, they’re extracting ancient genetic material from museum exhibits. Do their efforts represent hope for the future of the natural world? Or is science playing God?
Findings in the thawed permafrost of Siberia have made it possible to reconstruct the DNA of mammoths. Researchers are now experimenting with inserting genes related to the ability to resist cold temperatures into the Asian elephant, which is related to the mammoth. The animals thus created could survive in the steppes of Siberia and Alaska.
In Australia, scientists have managed to extract the genetic material of marsupial wolves from preserved embryos in museums. The predator’s genes are replicated in the lab and implanted into the related marsupial mouse – in a bid to bring the extinct creature back to life.
And biotechnology could also help white rhinos in Africa: Researchers in Berlin are fertilizing eggs from the last two living females with sperm from deceased males frozen and preserved for decades.
However, these practices are also attracting criticism. Biology researchers question the usefulness of revived species for natural habitats. They fear that the excitement surrounding the idea of bringing back extinct species could distract people from the many problems that cause animals to disappear, in the first place. Are some scientists playing God – with unforeseeable consequences for the environment?
#documentary #dwdocumentary #dwdocs #mammoth
______
DW Documentary (English): https://www.youtube.com/dwdocumentary
DW Documental (Spanish): https://www.youtube.com/dwdocumental
DW Documentary وثائقية دي دبليو (Arabic): https://www.youtube.com/dwdocarabia
DW Documentary हिन्दी (Hindi): https://www.youtube.com/dwdochindi
DW Doku (German): https://www.youtube.com/dwdoku
Watch the video by DW Documentary
About DW Documentary
DW Documentary gives you information beyond the headlines. Watch top documentaries from German broadcasters and international production companies. Meet intriguing people, travel to distant lands, get a look behind the complexities of daily life and build a deeper understanding of current affairs and global events.
Video “Should we bring extinct species back to life? | DW Documentary” was uploaded on 02/06/2025 by DW Documentary Youtube channel.
How about preventing the many species going extinct due to humans
In my opinions, I think it's just a wasting of resources
Herbivores of grass/herbes eating? Geant carnivorous predators eating whom? Omnivore Alimentaire? Where would located?
Do a Catholic saint!
No, we should not. Just let nature take it's cause. Have you not watched Jurrasic Park. Terrible idea.
All we want are Mammoths and T-Rex
"We're going to have to dip into the past and bring some of these species back …" NO, WE DON'T A*******!!! SMFH. 🤔
This all very cool, but I definitely prefer preserving extant species over bringing back fully extinct ones
Playing God for no reason
Thank you for your great video 🙏 CHEERS from Manchester Old England 😎❤️
"Species extinction date" is just a point in time like any other. While the longer a species has been extinct, the more complex its reintroduction might be, extinction itself is not a clear-cut boundary – so why would there even be a reason to treat it as an absolute dividing line. Viewing it that way is more of a superstition than a rational argument.
Some argue that we have a moral responsibility to bring back species we drove to extinction, but that’s not really my concern.
There are practical reasons beyond morality that could justify it, such as ecological benefits. If the species’ original habitat still exists and functions similarly to how it did before, then bringing it back could make sense. Likewise, if the species played a crucial role in an ecosystem that could still benefit from its presence, reintroducing it might be valuable. In some cases, extinct species—or similar substitutes—could help restore ecosystems, improve biodiversity, or even act as carbon sinks. For example, woolly mammoths could help slow permafrost thaw and promote grassland growth.
Another common argument against de-extinction is that "the time is right" (for death). But this "reasoning" is more superstition or quasi-religious thinking than anything scientific. Even then, religiously it may "make some sense" when applied to individuals than species. At least in the religious I know there is little focus on species as a whole, the all-mighty sees individuals, why would the time for a species as a whole be right?
So, the real question is whether we can reintroduce them in a way that benefits ecosystems, the environment, or even ourselves.
It’s also worth noting that not all extinctions happened in some distant, prehistoric past. When some mammoths disappeared, humans were already building pyramids. Grouping all extinct animals with dinosaurs oversimplifies the scale of time and ignores the varying contexts of extinction events.
So, should we bring back extinct species? It depends. If it benefits the environment, biodiversity, or even humanity – while being feasible and controlled – then probably yes. If not, then no.
I honestly don't know if we should, but I do know that the idea is way more exciting than bringing people to Mars.
people do not know the definition of 'extinct'. can't be done. even if you could extract Dino DNA from the blood of a mosquito trapped in amber, you STILL have to have a HOST that is alive, and how do you do that? there mere fact you have another living host, it can't be the same species of animal, aas you used a different host with a different DNA to make it happen
It's probably just a coincidence, but the timing of this documentary's release after the new Jurassic World Rebirth trailer couldn't have been better
All these history that points to thousand years are nothing but a myth.
This is the extension of human heroism, which might be questionable. I think people should stop playing "God" since we have already gone so far. Human don't have do backtracking if the root of the extinction problem resolves.
No.
What's the point?
{:o:O:}
Only if we can make them miniature! I want a pygmy mammoth!!😂🤣
We should stop killing each other first.
Why? So we can exploit them and hunt them back into extinction?
Time's right, life must take its time and course by itself
We are destroying the environment mammoths would need to live.
DW I love watching all of your documentaries but the way this documentary is framed speaks volumes even if it has good intentions. You can't even stop aging, yet you think you can reverse what God has willed? Arrogance truly has no limits. Scientists talk about ‘bringing back’ what God has taken, yet they can't even control the breath in their own lungs. "Reversing extinction"? 😂 Next, they’ll be talking about reversing death. Oh wait, only God can do that.
Humble yourselves 🙏
No, we have so many Jurassic movies giving us hints on what could go wrong😂
I want my T-Rex😊😮
We should bring back any species that we ourselves destroyed, probably back 50,000 ago, when we became dangerous to the planet.
But it cannot be just a single or a pair of animals or humans (Neanderthal, Denisovan, etc.) but rather entire populations in a way that repairs or ignores any bottleneck genetic in-breeding. Eh?
And then… the environment or niche that these animals were in should have to be restored.
Consider that.
Also consider the populations that would have to be restarted on Mars for that proposal to go forward.
Now talk about this proposal seriously. 😉
If we don't figure out how to stop polluting the planet, we may bring these species back only for them to go extinct once more.