The International Criminal Court (ICC), established in 2002, was created with the noble intention of holding accountable those responsible for committing some of the world’s most heinous crimes. Supporters believe that the court serves as a deterrent for would-be war criminals, strengthens the rule of law, and provides justice for victims of atrocities.
However, the ICC has faced criticism for its limited success in securing convictions, with only 11 successful cases in nearly 25 years, despite spending close to $2 billion. Compounding these challenges is the fact that major global powers such as the United States, China, and Russia are not members of the court, while many African governments feel that the ICC disproportionately targets Africa in its prosecutions.
As the world anxiously awaits the ICC’s decision on whether to issue arrest warrants for the leaders of Israel and Hamas, questions have emerged about the court’s effectiveness and relevance. Critics argue that the ICC may not be truly fit for purpose if it continues to struggle with convictions and faces accusations of political bias.
The debate surrounding the ICC’s role in international justice is complex and multifaceted. Ultimately, the question remains: is the International Criminal Court truly able to fulfill its mission of holding perpetrators of atrocities accountable, or does it lack the necessary mechanisms and support to effectively carry out its mandate?
Watch the video by Al Jazeera English
Video “The International Criminal Court: Fit for purpose? | People & Power Documentary” was uploaded on 07/07/2024 to Youtube Channel Al Jazeera English