The United Nations’ annual climate talks, known as COP, have come under scrutiny by key experts who argue that the current format is no longer effective in addressing the pressing issues of climate change.
In a recent video titled “UN climate talks ‘no longer fit for purpose’ say key experts” by BBC News, experts voiced their concerns about the shortcomings of the current COP process. Former negotiators and climate policy experts emphasized the urgent need for an overhaul to ensure meaningful and concrete actions are taken to combat climate change.
One of the primary criticisms of the current COP talks is the slow pace of progress and lack of ambitious goals set by world leaders. Despite numerous meetings and agreements, global emissions continue to rise and climate impacts are becoming more severe. Experts argue that the current format of negotiations is hindered by bureaucratic processes and lack of true commitment from governments to implement changes.
The video highlights the need for a more inclusive and transparent approach to climate negotiations, with a focus on involving key stakeholders such as civil society, indigenous communities, and youth activists. It also emphasizes the importance of setting ambitious targets and holding countries accountable for meeting their commitments to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
As the world faces increasingly severe climate impacts, the call for a more effective and ambitious approach to climate negotiations is growing louder. Key experts are urging for a radical overhaul of the current COP talks to ensure that the international community can effectively address the urgent challenges of climate change.
Watch the video by BBC News
Video “UN climate talks 'no longer fit for purpose' say key experts | BBC News” was uploaded on 11/15/2024 to Youtube Channel BBC News
So basically, we should all rollover and die?
These people are delusional and where's the data from 100,000 years ago? No cars, no mining or no deforestation back then.
Ice and other ages have come and gone, all by the grace of God. Mother Nature will do what she wants.
Go pedal your wares somewhere else.
UN climate talks 'were never fit for any purpose' . Fixed it.
Good. It is all BS.. CO2 is plant food.
BBC removed legit comments that do not comply with their agenda.
“He who dares not offend cannot be honest.” ― Thomas Paine
“If freedom of speech is taken away, then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter.”
– George Washington
“Stop sweet talking, tell him how you feel” – Malcolm X
the un is the problem that is babylon
Those are responsible who are using nuclear weapons during war. UN take action against crimescience which makes spoil climate.
COP 27 – Egypt – 694,000 barrels per day
COP 28 – United Arab Emirates – 3,200,000 million barrels of petroleum and liquids per day
COP 29 – Azerbaijan – 620,000 barrels of oil per day
Hmmmmmmmmmm
were an Irish town were not some welsh town
So happy to see supposed consensus fall apart. Drill baby drill.
COP OUT 29
🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬
BBC removed legit comments that do not comply with their agenda. So, here is another one. A country who has a king for a leader, is a country that has fools as subjects.
The COP conferences have been taken over by fossil fuel lobbyists
Trash UN ahould shut up.🤭
The climate is fine. They just want to make you poor under the guise of a burning planet. You can then suckle at the teat of government aid because you won't be able to keep warm, house or feed yourself.
It's hopeless I've given up already, especially with the trump administration we are cooked
If they stopped spraying atomized heavy metal particulates in the lower atmosphere, it wouldn't have such a greenhouse effect. But these crooks know that. They've got millions of simpletons believing carbon dioxide has anything whatsoever to do with temperature or climate with zero evidence.
The entire UN is no longer fit for purpose, and I hope Trump defunds it: along with the WHO.
Maybe just let it go. Seriously, just stop … the whole COP blah blah. Saving the world is just a birth control pill away. You don't need anyone's permission or agreement, just STOP having babies, and our population will decline rapidly. A world of 1 or 2 billion people is manageable, but 8 or 10 billion??! No, no nooo too many peeps.
I want to know when we're going to get a debate on climate change, a debate between scientists on both sides of the argument, we only one side. Is the BBC's policy still "the science is settled"? i.e. it's not up for discussion
Although we are passing the 1.5 C limit, abolish trade with countries that do not stick to the Paris agreement. That, of course, would include the States under Trump.
Britian got scammed and is now left looking stupid when none of the other leaders bothered
Climate change is a waste of time if you can’t get places like China or India on board
Trump doesn’t believe in climate change, and views rising sea levels as a positive as it would “give me more seafront property…”. In other words, he doesn’t care unless there is something in it for him….
"Scientists" 😂
Remember when scientists said the jab was a vaccine and would protect against infection and infecting others? 😂.
God is in control of the world, world leaders propose different methods to stop climate change, will try to stop air pollution and other unhealthy activities that contaminate our world, like Sunday laws, but won't be enough to fix our world.
It's good to see the wheels finally come off this scam.
The U.S. and Canada should reconsider their climate change programs. Their economies are stifled with the carbon tax disincentives while India and China build more coal-fired generation facilities. They are the fools for allowing other developed countries to ramp up their fossil fuel consumption.
Xp00😊t4
no shit
That’s ironic, the technologies that governments are peddling are also not fit for purpose, They should listen to themselves. Justin didn’t challenge this but instead quotes a bunch of politicians unqualified in technology. The BBC just jumps straight onto greenwash message. I remember when the UN mitigation draft report quoted Greenpeace as a credible citation! How can NGOs provide unbiased information?
UN is not here for the stuff they push on us. Bye bye
NAMES OF " EXPERTS" IS HELPFUL….
OTHERWISE ITS JUST PROPAGANDA
AS THE SWEDISH TROLL IS CERTAINLY NOT AN EXPERT