King Rat (1965) – A Haunting Portrait of Survival
Director: Bryan Forbes
Writer: James Clavell (based on his novel)
Cast:
- George Segal as Corporal King
- Tom Courtenay as Lieutenant O’Sullivan
- Patrick O’Neal as Colonel
In the dusky shadows of a Japanese POW camp during World War II, King Rat emerges as a gripping exploration of survival, morality, and human dynamics under unimaginable duress. Directed by Bryan Forbes and based on James Clavell’s compelling novel, this black-and-white film delivers a stark yet poignant narrative.
The story centers on Corporal King (George Segal), an American soldier who masterfully navigates the treacherous waters of captivity. Through cunning intellect and a network of black-market dealings, he ascends to a position of influence among his fellow prisoners, which not only garners respect but also stirs tension and jealousy. Segal’s performance encapsulates King’s complexities—an antihero whose survival instincts spark both admiration and disdain, evoking questions about the morality of his choices.
The dynamics within the camp serve as a microcosm for examining the human condition stripped of societal norms. While King thrives on opportunism, characters like Lieutenant O’Sullivan (Tom Courtenay) and Colonel (Patrick O’Neal) add layers of depth to the narrative, challenging notions of honor and sacrifice in the face of despair.
Bryan Forbes’ direction, coupled with the film’s gritty cinematography, accentuates the oppressive atmosphere of captivity. The film’s power resonates beyond its historical context, prompting viewers to reflect on the darker facets of survival and the ethical murkiness that often accompanies it. King Rat ultimately serves as a haunting portrayal of humanity’s fight to endure, making it a timeless piece that reflects the complexities of war and human nature.
Watch the video by Stream City
Video “King Rat | FREE MOVIE (George Segal, Tom Courtenay, Patrick O'Neal)” was uploaded on 10/06/2025 to Youtube Channel Stream City































Tigerland had a similar ending
I said I wanted YOU to tell me Marlowe!
Wow! This movie is free? Prob my second fav war drama after Apocalypse Now
That was a powerful ending.
A young Leonard Rossiter
display adjustment to brightnes an contrast . dark scenes look quite different on a 40 foot screen .
It reminds me a bit therilof spielvert el imperio del sol but this film IS even better
John Mills. Forgot he was in it!
Love the book love the film.
My children! The chickens.
Best scene is Hawkins dog and the men eating that stew.
From the great book of the same name, by Clavell, who was a Japanese POW. He respected the Japanese and wrote the Shogun series!
10 mins in and i already have an issue. When they put the trunk under the floor boards, what happened to the eggs?
Tom Courtenay was a terrific actor, especially as Pasha/Strelnikov in Doctor Zhivago.
I can’t believe that this is the first time I’m watching this movie I just wanna see everything that John Mills is in
I've been trying to find this movie for years, thanks for posting it.
Exceptionally good ❤
Great book, too.
Many thanks for sharing this.
An incredible cast of British actors John Mills ,even spotted Leanord Rossiter.Denholm Elliot playes a crucial part with Michael Cain in "To late the hero" Well worth a watch.It's such a shame that the yank director and producers turned this into a soap opera similar to a stalag film where they are dancing with betty grable.Changi was a hellhole no comfy bunks or sheds just a sea of mud for most.More British and ANZAKS died in Changi than on the railroad or sunk in transport ships taking them for slave labour in nipon."The railway man" is a good example of a survivor ,the biography is better than the film.
38:10 . Can’t imagine the spine shudder and the unfathomable resolve once realizing if no aid ship is nearby, Agonizing death of hundreds will be unescapable in an hour and a half at best. Such a tragedy thrust upon one who becomes the victim of man’s hubris.
First time I've watched this movie. No strong narrative but so many explorations of moral & personal interactions of how people try to reestablish a warped sense of normality & corrupt hierarchy in a new, alien environment, there is no loyal group bonding but only superficial alliances. King's emotionally distant exit, shunning a man he had deeply cared for, puzzled me, you could project many convincing reasons based on his previous distant, selfish, inauthentic character; but I think the story is about fear of intimacy. I liked that the end was left unresolved, vague, raising more dilemmas about the future, life isn't tidy. The note at the end reporting personal home casualties was a great touch showing a new chaos to come to terms with. There is no war hero victory narrative, the only heroism is in an act of humanity.
One of the subplots which was only hinted at and missing in this movie was the story behind the orderly in the hospital.
But transvestasism and homosexuality were not perceived as material appropriate for movies then.
Even though this movie was about the depths prisoners had to go to survive including selling themselves.
such a great movie, maybe Segal's best (that I have seen anyways) – you can feel the heat!
Thank you. This is the best thing on offer right now. What a movie!
The book is better but movie is good attempt and faithful to story