Sean Carroll: Are we living in a clockwork universe?
In his thought-provoking video, “Sean Carroll: Are We Living in a Clockwork Universe?”, physicist Sean Carroll delves into the intriguing implications of classical mechanics, particularly the principles laid down by Newton and expanded by Laplace. At the heart of this discussion is the notion of determinism: if we had perfect knowledge of the position and velocity of every particle, could we predict every aspect of the universe’s future? Carroll likens this idea to a “clockwork universe,” where every moment is predetermined by the laws of physics.
However, this deterministic perspective raises profound questions about free will and human agency. Carroll explains that although classical mechanics suggests a predetermined universe, the complexity of human consciousness and the limitations in our knowledge—neither of which can be captured by Laplace’s mythical demon—complicate this picture. He emphasizes that while the microscopic laws may be deterministic, our understanding and interaction with the world are shaped by incomplete information.
The video informs viewers that while the universe may operate like a machine, we navigate our lives as agents of choice, driven by nuanced instincts rather than mere mechanics. Join Carroll as he invites us to contemplate the balance between determinism and free will in our own lives and the universe at large.
Watch the video by Big Think
Author Video Description
“The universe clicks along in perfect accord with the laws of physics forever.”
Subscribe to Big Think on YouTube ► https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCvQECJukTDE2i6aCoMnS-Vg?sub_confirmation=1
Up next, Sean Carroll explains why physics is both simple and impossible | Full Interview ► https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_TBNJyztai0
What if the universe is a machine, and every moment in our past, present, and future is already encoded in the positions of its particles?
Physicist Sean Carroll explores the unsettling implications of classical mechanics, from Newton’s laws to Laplace’s thought experiment, showing how determinism challenges the very idea of free will.
0:00 Is reality a clockwork machine?
0:57 The determinism of classical mechanics
2:03 The spherical cow and simplified models
2:58 The universe as an equation
6:53 When the clockwork universe meets the human mind
Read the video transcript ► https://bigthink.com/series/the-big-think-interview/sean-carroll-clockwork-universe/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=video&utm_campaign=youtube_description
———————————————————————————-
Go Deeper with Big Think:
►Become a Big Think Member
Get exclusive content, early, ad-free access to new releases, and more. https://www.youtube.com/@bigthink/membership/
►Subscribe to Big Think on Substack
Explore content that enlightens, inspires, and transforms.
https://bigthinkmedia.substack.com/subscribe/
►Get Big Think+ for Business
Engage learners like never before with high-impact video microlearning from the biggest thinkers in the world. https://bigthink.com/plus/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=video&utm_campaign=youtube_description
———————————————————————————-
About Sean Carroll:
Dr. Sean Carroll is Homewood Professor of Natural Philosophy — in effect, a joint appointment between physics and philosophy — at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, and fractal faculty at the Santa Fe Institute. Most of his career has been spent doing research on cosmology, field theory, and gravitation, looking at topics such as dark matter and dark energy, modified gravity, topological defects, extra dimensions, and violations of fundamental symmetries. These days, his focus has shifted to more foundational questions, both in quantum mechanics (origin of probability, emergence of space and time) and statistical mechanics (entropy and the arrow of time, emergence and causation, dynamics of complexity), bringing a more philosophical dimension to his work.
About Big Think
Big Think is the leading source of expert-driven, actionable, educational content — with thousands of videos, featuring experts ranging from Bill Clinton to Bill Nye, we help you get smarter, faster. Get actionable lessons from the world’s greatest thinkers & doers. Our experts are either disrupting or leading their respective fields.
Video “Sean Carroll: Are we living in a clockwork universe?” was uploaded on 10/16/2025 to Youtube Channel Big Think
Peter Tse and Tom Talbott enter the chat
Sorry but the biggest strawman argument. Nobody worries that we don't have free will. Just listen to the 24/7 political debates where we are all trying to impose policy on one another. Human beings are social animals and we want others to be predictable and agree with us in how they behave and think.
Time is cyclic.
What a bunch of kindergarten level babble. "Pretty much deterministic"??? So absurd.
I like Neil deGrasse Tyson, but his obstinate insistence that philosophy has nothing meaningful to contribute to modern physics or to the natural sciences for that matter strikes me as injudicious posturing that betrays his conceit. Even Charles Darwin during his time was humble enough in the opening passages of "The Origin of Species" to acknowledge his substantive indebtedness to the classical philosophers, more precisely, to Aristotle for the rudimentary conceptualizations of the idea of evolution. Never count out philosophy! From someone currently taking a course in the history and philosophy of science❤
The cow, just like a human, is a toroid, albeit a twisted one. There's a hole between the mouth and anus.
Can you imagine the pain and free will it took, to write The Three body problem, Across the spider verse and Arcane, then some clown comes to you and says, that it was determined…😂
So what are you telling me, is that everything that Donald Trump has done since becoming president, was determined? 😂 Freewill had nothing to do with it, even though there's clearly a vote.
You sound like a hippie, not a scientist. Do you want an Oscar or a Nobel Peace prize for that line of thought? Oh wait, that has yet to be determined.
Can you believe this guy?
Y'all didn't choose Donald Trump, it was written. 😂 Wow, the arrow of time, is playing God and favoritism.
Tsk. Jokes man ting. That's how I know "big think" has a lot of small ideas.
Infinitely large meets infinitely small in the eye of the observer. We live in a toroidal black hole.
Finite Nature vs Infinite Nature:
Everything naturally occurring is Nature, which includes plants, microorganisms, humans (all lifeforms), atoms, energy, stars, planets, black holes, cancer, AIDS, space, Dreams, and Consciousness.
(Why would Nature be finite?)
Without Infinity, there is only infinite regress; E.g. String Theory: what caused the strings, where did the strings come from, what came before the strings; E.g. The Big Bang: what caused the initial singularity, what came before the initial singularity, etc. Considering "Nothingness" is an obvious fallacy, there must always be Something.
Prove Nothingness, while keeping in mind: Nothingness can only be "proven" in the absence of an observer. If described (observed) by an observer, Nothing becomes something (think hard about this). This would also connote a field of infinite Nothingness randomly formed a spec (our Universe) of somethingness – which is nonsensical.
Provisional science cannot claim authority over reality, at best it can only provide fuzzy hints. Science is a game of "let’s pretend," played with symbols and sensors. Its power lies in utility, not truth. To mistake physics/maths for reality is to worship the finger pointing at the moon.
Our cosmological sciences are akin to a microorganism residing within a human (on Earth), actively exploring the Andromeda galaxy. Our nearly insignificant signals bouncing off of fragments of Infinity – the margins for error are "astronomical".
"So far as the theories of mathematics are about reality, they are not certain; and as far as they are certain, they do not refer to reality" – Albert Einstein
A thought experiment:
On a plain sheet of paper, draw a single dot (.) in the very center.
The paper represents infinite space. Everything beyond the boundaries of the sheet also represents endless (empty) space.
The dot represents 'The Big Bang'.
Everything humanity is aware of – exists within the dot (our currently expanding universe).
If the observers of this singular dot, zoom far enough away – the dot will cease to exist. The dot will be extinguished through expansion/evaporation – wholly consumed by an infinite void (due to cosmic scales/distances). This would prohibit existence from 'being'. (Yet here we are).
Furthermore this would connote The Big Bang occurred at random, within an infinite void of nothingness – suggesting 'somethingness from nothingness' – which is a fallacy.
Without considering potential forces being exerted upon our reality/universe (from beyond the boundaries of our observations) – is an incomplete interpretation.
Clearly the remainder of the sheet of paper cannot be an infinite void.
The expansion of our universe is accelerating. If our cosmic expansion were occurring within a void, our reality would have concluded before it began (poof). (Yet here we are).
If we are a facet of Infinity – we are Infinity. Along with everything being intimated.
Instead imagine the sheet and everything beyond – riddled with infinite dots.
Every universe is a particle, every particle is a universe.
(Infinity is self-propagating).
Thus Infinity is a superdeterministic preexisting condition.
Infinity being absolute simultaneity.
Expresses infinite probabilities – Deterministically.
Every reality.
Every life.
Is an intended narrative.
(The largest cannot exist without the smallest)
Although our universe is finite (as evidenced by expansion).
Infinity exists at a fixed maximal size, without borders/boundaries: Infinity is forever in every sense, within which infinite universes/realities are housed – each a distinct experience.
(Infinity > Multi)
Infinity accounts for every variation, including variations in thoughts.
Reality is an infinite fractal consciousness; whereby all realities, every possibility, along with every imaginable and unimaginable thing, is a fragment of said consciousness – which we refer to as Nature.
We are Nature.
We are "God" (figurative); fragmented into infinite experiences.
An Infinity without borders or constraints; with infinite energy.
We are all the same entity; existing for the sake of experiences.
Time:
A seemingly endless cadence of day/night cycles, conducted over the course of the Human epoch. Untold billions of Homo Sapiens Sapiens; generation after generation – conditioned by Nature to accept finality. The circadian rhythm, an innate mechanism, a constant reminder; consciousness an ephemeral experience, fleeting with every moment, through every exhalation. Selene a blanket of night, engulfing all into her dreamy embrace – the analog of Stella, raining rays of warmth, nourishing existence into being; beckoning the vivacity of life to stir yet again.
Day into night, night into day – a rhythm to remind us that none of Natures constructs are created without an expiry. Whether measured by 6.62607004 × 10-34 m2 kg / s; or by a Supereon, we are cascading energies, propagating our collective experiences – vainly attempting to elicit a sense of ‘self’ in hopes of staving off oblivion. Not realizing that the only allowable paradox to exist, is existence; a lucid dream conducted by the everlasting artistry of Gaia.
Time.
—
the Alchemist
-Ø1
I've always felt like i'm where i'm supposed to be
One doesn't need free will, just the perception of it so it seems.
B.F. Skinner, father of behavioral science and a full on deterministic advocate, said regarding our lack of Free Will that if you fall off a boat, you can try to swim back.
I'm liking the Post Deterministic approach. Where rather than initial states predeterminally causing future events. A predetermined ultimate outcome forces events to happen. IOW the butterfly did not cause the tornado. The eventual tornado required the butterfly to have existed.
Heisenburg uncertainty principle states that you can't know everything so you can't know the future so life is undetermened so you have a free will. Oh you don't discus QM in your video, that explains it, you are a newtonian 🙂 You stopped being relevant in 1920
Randomness is built into the very fabric of the Universe. That may or may not have implications for free will, but it definitely does for determinism.
that's exactly the idea of jyotish/astrology.
7:16 had me questioning time then i found 0:26
I agree with every word that man said
What had me re-listening and processing more fully was the assertion that applying the laws of physics in other sciences doesn’t work well. I’m often sharing with clients the mood swings that are based on judgments rather than truth, and how that sets us up for an equal, opposite swing the other way, ie Toxic positivity will become toxic negativity. I think the laws of the universe, are applicable in all aspects of life and sciences, though we may not know how YET. Maybe one day the truth will be understood as one great whole.
Is it impossible to have a real “vast intelligence” that knows everything, all atoms and molecules in the universe through space and time? Some people have already defined and written about this Intelligence long before Laplace across cultures the world over.
Have we not yet defined / named this “vast intelligence” because the world is not “fixed” in our opinion? What is fixed? Who decides absolute fixing?
Our brains like clarity: good / bad, pretty / ugly, up / down, democrat / republican. Patterns means it can take a break from consideration and thought. If this is good then that must be bad. EASY.
Two opposites can and do exist at the same time. It is the paradox in which we find ourselves daily, though it can be / is uncomfortable.
I love my partner AND I don’t want to see him at breakfast.
I do kind things AND I was rude.
Nature is beautiful AND cruel.
VERY interesting thought that we can be both deterministic and agents. Perhaps it’s the application of force on our agency that shifts its meaning. ( See Dr. Hawkins Power vs Force)
1:42 “the world with all its peculiarities and specificities…(physicists) boil it down to really really simple systems” like frictionless surfaces, pendula, where a situation is idealized and there are no complications. This strategy “will completely fail if we try to do it for psychology or biology or political science but for physics it works incredibly well.”
4:47 “(T)he laws of physics would let you go backwards and reverse engineer what exact configuration the balls were in. We don’t perceive that in our everyday world because the world is full of noise and dissipation and air resistance and things like that. But in the pristine perfect world of imagined classical mechanics, the past and the future work equally well. You can from any one moment to any other moment.
5:31 “the implications of this idea are profound for how we think about what physics is and what physics tells us.” 5:37 “The structure of classical mechanics implies that if you knew the position and velocity not just of one particle but of every particle in the universe, and you knew the laws of physics and had limitless calculation abilities – none of these are at all plausible but we are imagining right now- then the laws of physics would determine what happens next, at the next moment, and the next moment, and infinitely far into the future, and for that matter, indefinitely far into the past.”
6:29 “Laplace …put it in terms of a metaphor. Imagine a vast intelligence who could know everything about the universe in any one moment, to that vast intelligence the past and the future are an open book. You would know everything, because what happens now fixes the entirety of space and time.
7:05 Clockwork Universe Paradigm
7:59 “ in principle, if you knew exactly everything going on in the universe, you could predict the future.” “You don’t know all the positions of all the atoms and molecules that make up you.”
8:17 “ It is impossible to have a real LaPlace’s demon (someone that knows all the things) in the universe.”
8:29 Compatibilism “on the one hand, the deep down microscopic laws of physics are completely deterministic, or their not if you’re in quantum physics, but they’re pretty deterministic anyways. But since you don’t know it, you should be asking yourself, ‘what is the best I can do? What is the best way that I can understand human beings given the vastly incomplete information I have?”
9:19 “you will model, you will think about a fellow human being or yourself as an AGENT capable of making choices… and that’s the right thing to do because you are not LaPlace’s demon.”
This from a guy that believes in Lambda CDM. Someone has lost his free will and scientific method, dont believe him.
What if we do not live in a deterministic universe after all? The whole concept of determinism is based on knowing the future, and it should be pretty obvious to anyone that the future is not knowable. Besides, if determining is a mental function, doesn't that mean that humans have to be in the universe for it to be determined? The whole concept of determinism is a misfiring of the human brain.
Determinism is unfalsifiable.