In a bold move that has stirred controversy among economists, former President Donald Trump has unveiled a plan to implement drastic tariffs on imports as a key component of his economic strategy. These tariffs would include a staggering 60% on goods from China, and 10%-20% on products from the rest of the world.
The concept of tariffs, essentially taxes on imported goods, has been a contentious issue throughout history. Trump’s proposal aims to use these tariffs as a means of generating revenue to offset tax cuts. However, the effectiveness and repercussions of such a plan are a subject of debate.
The Wall Street Journal’s latest video titled “Why Economists Hate Trump’s Tariff Plan” explores the implications of these proposed tariffs. The video delves into the mechanics of tariffs, how they can potentially create jobs, and why they are difficult to remove once implemented.
One key concern raised by economists is the impact these tariffs could have on trade relations, particularly with China. Given the interconnectedness of the global economy, such a drastic shift in trade policy could have far-reaching consequences.
As the debate over Trump’s tariff plan continues to unfold, it remains to be seen how this controversial policy will shape the economic landscape in the coming years. With experts weighing in on both sides of the argument, the future of US trade policy hangs in the balance.
Watch the video by The Wall Street Journal
Video “Why Economists Hate Trump’s Tariff Plan | WSJ” was uploaded on 10/17/2024 to Youtube Channel The Wall Street Journal
The chicken war, the most ignorant, childish, playground fight situation ever created. Grow up and sort it out like adults, not countries fighting like kids in diapers over two toys. Ridiculous, and unfortunately nothings changed, this same behavior continues to this day.
Worst President in history. Prove me wrong.
Possibly the worst advertisement for Wharton ever
I don’t know what’s more absurd, Trump’s stupidity or his congregation’s gullibility.
Yeah, we should follow the guy who has yet to produce a successful business, while lying his @$$ off about his umpteen failures…………!!!
An across the board tariff could function as a de facto federal sales tax. If we can’t reform tax law to balance the books, this might be the way to go.
The guest in this clip is not effective and convincing in how he explains things. He is not doing “the weave” that makes many English professors have tears in their eyes. I lose interest very quickly.
is WSJ changing the trend now?
Still have tariffs up on Canadian softwood lumber. Consumers will take it in the teeth to rebuild Florida and the Gulf Coast states after multiple hurricanes. All because of the US forestry lobby.
Crazy to me how Republicans are defending this. You can like Trump and Vote for him but at least admit how stupid this "Tariff Plan" is… You raise Import prices then domestic prices increase as they have more demand…
Trump is a serial liar, obviously he has no clue when it comes to econmics. Remeber he actually manged to tank a casino in Vegas. Tariffs will only affect companies, which will increase the prices of products will will affect consumers who pays for the tariffs. It is basic economics omg.
Didnt President Biden added tariffs for the Chinese EVs that are supposed to save the climate? Explain that, liberals
Because Trump doesn't know what he's talking about
Eventually we will have to pay the price for decades of trading with China. Ever since the Clinton administration, we have proped up an oppressive China that uses slave labor. Naively thinking that open trade with low/no tariffs would buy us favor with them. Trump is the first President in more than 30 years to finally acknowledge that this cannot continue.
What about Biden tariff to china over 100 percent tariff to protect garbage cars companies and solar panels etc. why can't we buy safe and cheaper cars?? Why consumers need to pay $$$$$ for these garbage gm.
Almost every company that he's touched has gone to bankruptcy. How do you bankrupt a casino? Ask Trump 😂
The thing is consumers are also workers. The chinese gouvernment supports their low prices with subsidies to destroy foreign industries. They want to get so big that they have a monopoly. You can have cheap chinese products and high paying american jobs. How should this work? If you dont buy what you work for who buys your products?
We don’t need junk from china.
Whining about creating jobs, what’s Kamala’s plan? Just let China undercut us forever? Something has got to give
The short term effects and distortions are clear enough. However I’ve recently seen economists admitting the value of maintaining or recovering the domestic capacity to build things and admit tariffs may be effective at accomplishing that goal. But the sentiment of the commentariat here is so overwhelmingly in favor of the global trade status quo, I’m not optimistic about finding a nuanced discussion here that breaks at all from the orthodoxy.
Just for those who might not be aware, the way allies and others paid the US back as Trump put it, many times over is by having their markets open to US companies and their products. That in itself is the single biggest wealth creation mechanism and Trump would be undermining that.
Lies they don’t hate it. Just say you support Harris
They hate it cause trump is trying to destroy the world.
One dimensional moronic thinking, dominates this comment section.
Tariffs are useful for protecting industries. For example, protectionism supported China's steel industry in the early 2000s and was responsible for tech giants like Huawei and Xiaomi as well as its whole internet infrastructure, wechat and all.
No person with grey matter between their ears thinks that tarrifs have an immediate economic pay off, but longterm these few thousand jobs compound and actually creat huge economic industries. That's not even talking about national security issues with being de-industrialized. The whole chinese success story was built on this premise.
These economists know this but are often dishonest because they have a personal stake in the stockmarket.
The factors economist leave out are that China needs are market US is the richest country we can afford to purchase their products same with Japan. Europe won't import foreign made cars. Also the need to maintain the US manufacturing jobs and capabilities like we saw with computer chips production. Cheap labor allows Wal-Mart to fill our country with cheap junk.
You people need to stop pushing neoliberal slop. The reason Trump tariffs are stupid is because he does a one size fits all solution instead of targeted and is an ego manic who doesn’t listen with experts who have same goals (why he fired every cabinet persons except his son in law) but are make a complex plan. It is proof through Bidens tariff that have been great and so was LBJ’s. You keep talking about China they deserve no good faith and prove it every year since 1973. The neoliberal peace dividend is over get used to it. You neoliberal live in utter delusion of outsource everything you would outsource the F-35s too if you could. Countries like Norway, Denmark, Italy, Poland, Uk, Korea, Japan, Philippines, Australia, Nafta partners, Columbia, Netherlands and poor ones that just sell invaluable things like toys or commodities that are us friendly deserve trade with US. This does not apply to China, Russia, France, Germany, India, Malaysia, Hungary, Slovakia, Austria, Ireland do not where we find acceptable we allow if not we hit them hard back. These countries don’t deserve the good faith you neoliberals ask for they’ve done nothing for us and we owe them nothing back after all the help we’ve given. The chicken tax is amazing work by LBJ it’s hilarious how you think we’re supposed to cater to west Germany then (including current reunited Germany) who spends on us for security and demands free trade from us while putting tariffs on us. This one term applies free trade has been proven wrong especially the dumb belief that trade prevents wars with enemies, 2022 proved it all and took this long and a new German government (SPD) to realize they took the usa for granted while spending on Russia and China for gdp.
Isn´t Trump the only person in history who was able to bankrupt a casino?
Are you serious, Trump fans?
Ronald Reagan restricted the import of motorcycles over the size of 1000cc in the 1980s. To help save Harley Davidson jobs and the company.
seriously going to gloss over the fact that Biden has maintained many Trump-era tariffs? Trump isn't the only pro-tariff candidate.
Putting tariffs on the USA puts a stop to Globalisation. Its litteraly a game-changer
Consumers pay for tariffs and they add to inflation. I don't trust the convicted felon to hold the check book.
Do not mess with free markets!
Trump is just a TV host. Not economy expert. OK they managed to save the US automobile industry. How about farmers? When China switch suppliers
There are to kinds of Trump voters: 1.) The ignorant. 2.) Those who understand very well that he is a moron, but benefit from the ignorance of others by supporting him anyway. Do you understand that he is a moron but benefit from supporting him? Now you know which kind of Trump voter you are. Cheers.
Maybe He should increase the tariff to 1000 %. Nobody say anything about he is taxing America consumers. Nobody willing to say, the Emperor is naked .
The only war nobody wins: a trade war. Trump is an absolute buffoon for even suggesting tariffs to this level, and the fact he’s even peddling the idea of a 100%+ tariff in some respects would be catastrophic to the US and world economies.
Lets start with this.
1) How do liberals expect to raise wages. When there is no protection for American workers!?!?.
2) Most countries already had protectionist Tariffs on American products.
3) Losing your production capacity is a National Security Risk. So you either have to pay insane amounts to keep unused production capabilities or you cant make what you need when you need it.
4) We are continent sized nation. With the worlds 3rd largest population. Just like China can support an encapsulated economy. We can too. I dont feel sorry for Billionaires wanting an extra billion from international markets.
5) Corporate disloyalty to US is a thing. The more thier market is not primarily in the US. The more these American Companies will willing work against the interest of the American people. Simple leverage and economics.
I am tired of these Econmist who can't find a solution that doesn't screw over the work suddenly having all these opinions about tariffs. Neoliberalism had a 30 year run, and it has been an objective failure. If you think America is a better position now than it was in 1994 you are a fool.
Strategic tariffs are smart but not overall blanket tariffs which raise prices and taxes in, consumers
Could the washing machine issue not be solved by the government regulating the price of domestic washers and preventing price gouging by setting a MRP like in India or China?
Will the tariffs also apply to the MAGA merch from China?
Is WSJ still all about it?
Even Lagarde said this morning tariffs are bad for everyone. And trade wars lead to real wars
Here is what I don’t understand. All Trumpists talk about is costing foreign governments an additional 20 percent to sell their goods in the US. What they don’t talk about is the increase costs that get passed along to the consumers by the foreign companies, they don’t talk about retaliatory tariffs that other countries will impose on US goods, and there are international agreements that Trump will violate.
Given the persisting global economic crisis, it's essential for individuals to focus on diversifying their income streams independent of governmental reliance. This involves exploring options such as stocks, gold, silver, and digital currencies. Despite the adversity in the economy, now is an opportune moment to contemplate these investment avenues.
A second Trump presidency stands to radically remake world trade: https://on.wsj.com/4f88Up3