Pop superstar Taylor Swift’s recent endorsement of Vice President Kamala Harris in the US presidential race has sparked a wave of speculation and discussion about the influence of celebrity endorsements in politics. The singer-songwriter’s decision to publicly support Harris comes as a surprise to many, as Swift has been notoriously private about her political views in the past.
Swift’s endorsement of Harris is significant for several reasons. Firstly, Swift has a massive global following, particularly among young people, who may be swayed by her political opinions. This could potentially mobilize a large number of voters to support Harris and the Democratic ticket in the upcoming election.
Additionally, Swift’s endorsement adds to Harris’ credibility and appeal as a candidate. As a powerful and influential figure in the entertainment industry, Swift’s backing could help to legitimize Harris’ campaign and attract even more support from voters.
However, it is important to note that celebrity endorsements are not always a guarantee of electoral success. While Swift’s support may generate excitement and momentum for Harris, it ultimately remains to be seen how much of an impact it will have on the outcome of the election.
Overall, Swift’s endorsement of Harris highlights the increasingly blurred lines between entertainment and politics in the modern media landscape. As celebrities continue to wield substantial influence over public opinion, their endorsements can play a significant role in shaping the political landscape.
Watch the video by FRANCE 24 English
Video “US presidential election: How significant is Taylor Swift’s endorsement of Kamala Harris?” was uploaded on 09/12/2024 to Youtube Channel FRANCE 24 English
I enjoyed viewing France outlook. I live in a battle state in 🇺🇸. Ads all day long. Going 💙 in November. We are ready to get this over.
Not at all!
Swift has 9 cats, lots of moneybut no family… reject hollywood american fake values. Its not American
I Registered using her Insta Link. 😊
Julia Sieger tech editor or science editor? If science editor as the chyron says maybe she should bring up how Taylor Swifts 8205 tons of carbon footprint per annum from travel alone doesn’t support Kamala’s climate emergency narrative.
It's being reported in the US that voter registrations have increased dramatically after her endorsement.
The millions wasted in this Presidential Campaign is Immoral
Are people claiming that she wouldn’t?
Dick Cheney also endorsed the laughing Hyena so what does that tell you?
Musk is a questionable parent at best
Following the debate, and her Instagram post (not Tweet), the site she linked for people to register, received 337,000 visits.
SOURCE: "More than 337,000 people visit Taylor Swift's link to register to vote", NBC News.
Due Dissidence
Dick Cheney endorses Kamala Harris
Glenn Greenwald
Dems applaud Dick Cheney's endorsement of Kamala
To be honest, if you’re swayed by who Taylor Swift is voting for, you’re probably already a low-information Democratic voter anyway. 😅