Will a Trump presidency stall the US’s scientific progress?

In a historic move, Scientific American endorsed Joe Biden for president four years ago – the publication’s first endorsement in its nearly 180-year history. Now, with the possibility of a Trump presidency on the horizon, many are questioning what impact it may have on the United States’ scientific progress.

Throughout his time in office, President Trump has been met with criticism from the scientific community for his stance on issues such as climate change, vaccination, and funding for research. His administration has rolled back regulations designed to protect the environment, withdrawn from international agreements aimed at combating climate change, and proposed significant cuts to federal funding for scientific research.

These actions have raised concerns about the future of scientific progress in the United States under a potential second term for President Trump. Many worry that his policies could further stall advancements in key areas such as renewable energy, medical research, and technology.

In contrast, Joe Biden has outlined a comprehensive plan to address climate change, increase funding for scientific research, and prioritize evidence-based decision-making. His campaign has received endorsements from many prominent scientists and science organizations, who believe that his presidency would better support and advance scientific progress in the country.

As the election draws near, the question of whether a Trump presidency would stall the US’s scientific progress remains at the forefront of many voters’ minds. The outcome of the election could have significant implications for the future of scientific research and innovation in the United States.