In a significant shift in monetary policy, the United States Federal Reserve raised its benchmark interest rate for the first time since 2020, a decision announced on Wednesday. This move marks a departure from the trend of lower interest rates that President Donald Trump has fervently advocated over recent years. The rate hike, delivered by Chairman Kevin Warsh, is positioned as a response to a recovering economy grappling with the compounded effects of geopolitical tensions, particularly the ongoing conflict in the Middle East.
During his statement, Warsh noted, “Economic activity is expanding at a solid pace,” yet he acknowledged that “uncertainty remains elevated,” attributing this to the war’s influence on economic stability and consumer confidence. Warsh’s remarks underscore the delicate balancing act the Fed must manage: stimulating growth while also combating inflationary pressures that threaten to destabilize the economy.
The Fed’s decision to raise the interest rate aims to cool consumer spending and rein in inflation, which has surged amid supply chain disruptions and rising commodity prices linked to international crises. By making borrowing more expensive, the Fed hopes to temper demand and stave off an overheating economy.
Notably, Chairman Warsh’s appointment by President Trump has drawn scrutiny in light of the recent decision. The President has been vocally critical of high-interest rates, claiming they hinder economic growth, and he has even threatened to impose restrictions on trade with key partners if such rates were not lowered. This latest move from the Federal Reserve appears to challenge Trump’s stance, signaling a commitment to monetary independence amid political pressures.
As the global economy continues to navigate complex challenges, the Fed’s decision reflects a broader strategy to maintain economic stability while confronting the uncertainties posed by external factors. This pivotal moment in U.S. monetary policy not only reshapes the economic outlook but may also redefine the relationship between the White House and the central bank in the months to come.
Watch the video by Global News
Video “US Fed defies Trump, raising benchmark interest rate for 1st time in 3 years” was uploaded on 09/17/2026 to Youtube Channel Global News






































Dont worry, its gon be alright. Rich is becoming more richer and poor is dying.
Food, gas, diesel, electricity, clothes, school supplies, cars, electronics, insurance, inflation, unemployment…all lower under Biden in 2024.
Don't you have Canada news?
Rates should always be between 5% and 10%
Jerome Powell is having a good day somewhere
Probably more hikes coming in the future. I bet it’s 5% or close to that. It’s to comeback inflation mostly.
To any American reading this. 2 years of trump has caused 5 rate increases. 2 in 2026 and 3 in 2027. A lot of people are gonna die around the world due to this.
And Sanders and Pelosie still have 4 mansions a piece and millions more than you. Two tier reports.
Federal reserve is a joke, criminal.
but trump says the US is doing greater than ever. you mean he lied??
trump admin is the worst in history, every single one of em
The Midterms can’t come fast enough
he's going to rename something today.
Guess the USA is cutting all trade off with the world starting today. Good luck
Its all global news pumps out Trump bad hamas good climate change real its unbelievable
I love that US banks are now investing into Canadian banks much more LOL. Thanks tRump 👍
By this logic, Canadian interest rates should have gone up a long time ago.
Should put some tarrifs on the fed. I hear that works
A president drops bombs, who picks up the mess ? tax payers. A president drops tarrif bombs, who pays ? tax payers. Yes funny how establishments work, even here in Canada, they make moves like they are your daddy but when they screw up which is pretty much 100% of the time, who pays daddys bills ? tax payers. This system is one big slavery I have come to understand. We are all slaves of the modern era. And the media just wheels us along, pretending like they are our friendly messenger. Only they take their paychecks from ? Establishments. Who get paid for by ?…….. Tax payers . FML
If trumps angry it only means he's not profiting
Despite what Trump thinks you can’t run an economy on make believe.
We need police in our business Inshallah 🇺🇸
The ship has altered course in the right direction a few degrees to the left whilst the president was asleep. God help the helmsman when he wakes up.
Carney and Trump are playing Canadians and Americans. They are in it together.
This is going to burn Donnie's butt. LMAO
I ask the Google AI this question.
"We are at war with the US, so want to cut as many ties to them as we can. I really don't care if the US survives. I am just looking for every way we can weaken them while they are also weakening themselves. Their economic position has weakened compared to what it was. They have also weakened themselves militarily and need both aluminium and nickel to replace all the ordinance.
I'm looking to find the best way the hurt them by disrupting their just in time supply chain or just walking away from them. The three options I have come up with besides finding new customers for our resources."
This was it's answer.
Here is the complete analysis of your three tactical options for disrupting the "just-in-time" supply chain and applying maximum pressure:
These three tactics directly target the core vulnerabilities of a "just-in-time" (JIT) supply chain, which relies on flawless predictability and razor-thin inventory margins.
By weaponizing supply chain friction, domestic re-allocation, and financial penalties, you can systematically degrade an adversary's industrial capacity while building up your own. Here is an analysis of how each of your three options maximizes pressure:
## Option 1: Intentional Delays and Back-Ordering
Manufacturing lines for complex defense equipment (like missiles, fighter jets, and munitions) operate on strict schedules. Missing a single high-grade nickel alloy or aluminum component can halt an entire factory.
* How it hurts them: By artificially creating "rolling delays" or placing vital shipments on back-order, you force their defense contractors to constantly recalculate production timelines. They cannot plan production runs, labor shifts, or delivery schedules.
* The "JIT" Shatter: Just-in-time systems do not carry safety cushions. A two-week delay in a nickel delivery doesn't just delay the metal—it idles the multi-million dollar robotic welding line, wastes factory capacity, and stalls the rollout of finished ordnance.
* The Diplomatic Cover: Unlike an outright embargo, back-ordering and logistical slowing can be blamed on "technical audits," "equipment maintenance," or "labor shortages," making it harder for them to legally trigger immediate treaty clauses or retaliatory frameworks.
## Option 2: Diverting Production to Domestic Nation-Building
The most effective way to deny resources to an adversary is to legitimately use them yourself. Re-routing critical metals into domestic infrastructure, green grids, and local high-tech manufacturing permanently removes that supply from the export market.
* How it hurts them: It creates a permanent structural deficit in their supply chain. They cannot argue that you are unfairly withholding resources if your own domestic industries are actively consuming them.
* The Strategic Benefit: While they are forced to bleed financial and political capital trying to source expensive, lower-quality replacements from halfway across the world, you are actively upgrading your own nation's economic foundation.
* The Ordnance Crunch: Because they urgently need aluminum and nickel right now to replenish depleted military stockpiles, a sudden domestic diversion on your end starves their defense industrial base at the exact moment their domestic demand spikes.
## Option 3: Imposing a Surtax on Resource Exports
If you do choose to let a fraction of resources cross the border to maintain leverage, a heavy surtax ensures that their industrial survival comes at an astronomical financial cost.
* How it hurts them: It drains their treasury. Rebuilding military ordnance is incredibly resource-intensive; forcing them to pay a premium tax on every pound of aluminum or nickel directly inflates their defense budget.
* Economic Distortion: A surtax makes their finished goods less competitive on the global stage. Their aerospace and manufacturing sectors will face soaring input costs, worsening their already weakened economic position.
* Funding Your Own Projects: The revenue generated from the surtax acts as a direct wealth transfer. You can funnel their own capital directly into funding the nation-building projects mentioned in Option 2, effectively forcing them to subsidize your economic decoupling.
## Summary of Impact
Combining these three options creates a compounding economic trap:
1. Option 1 breaks the synchronized rhythm of their factories.
2. Option 2 permanently shrinks the total pool of resources available to them.
3. Option 3 ensures that whatever small amount they do manage to secure bleeds them financially.
I give this analysis two thumbs up. After all they emphatically claimed they don't need anything from us.
Yes we can't go toe to toe with the US but we can badly hurt them with strategic means. Our best hope beside finding much, much better and trustworthy economic partners is Guerrilla style economic warfare. United Statians are not very tough. They retreat whenever they get hurt enough. So we duck and didge while landing blows whenever we can while accepting we will be getting hurt in the process but sucking it up like grown ups do. Boxing matches aren't a guarantee that the slugger will beat the one who is able to duck and weave and do the rope-a-dope.
Jerome Powell will now undergo a full blown FBI investigation.