In a show of support for Ukraine, the United States and Britain have pledged nearly $1.5 billion in additional aid to the war-torn country. This announcement comes as top diplomats from both nations visit Kyiv, where Ukrainian officials are renewing their pleas to use Western-provided missiles against targets deeper inside Russia.
The ongoing conflict between Ukraine and Russia has escalated in recent weeks, with Russian forces advancing further into Ukrainian territory. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has been appealing to Western allies for more support, including advanced weaponry to defend against the Russian invasion.
The $1.5 billion in aid from the US and UK is a significant contribution towards Ukraine’s efforts to fend off the Russian aggression. However, the key question remains – will these Western allies back Ukraine’s requests for strikes into Russia?
The situation is delicate, as any direct military action against Russia could risk further escalation and draw other countries into the conflict. While the US and UK are committed to providing support to Ukraine, they may be wary of openly endorsing strikes into Russian territory.
As tensions continue to mount in the region, the international community is closely watching how the situation unfolds. The fate of Ukraine hangs in the balance, as the country faces a formidable adversary in Russia. The decisions made by Western powers in the coming days and weeks will undoubtedly have a significant impact on the outcome of this conflict.
Watch the video by FRANCE 24 English
Video “US, UK pledge $1.5 billion in new Ukraine aid, but will they back strikes into Russia? • FRANCE 24” was uploaded on 09/12/2024 to Youtube Channel FRANCE 24 English
Us will help Ukraine until the Last Ukrainian stand…😂😂😂😂😂
US will support Until no Ukranian left.
How these people are delusional really baffling
Look gaza, Biden is useless
60B was wasted few months ago, still wondering what 1.5B can do that 60B couldn't.
But France gives Nothing again?????
If USA and Europe did not fuell this war it would have been solved ages ago.Europeans do not want to see their money spent supporting wars!!! we want our money to be spent in our hospitals, our schools, our elderly, our lives!!!
Why dont they use those in eastern Ukrain where Russia is taking villages and villages???
Wonderful missile man is silent, and the silence of North Korea is questionable. At the same time, Cuba is not covered by the newspapers.
The balled speaker is blabbering as usual, with all his knowledge from internet reads.
Zelensky should dip into his off shore accounts and shell companies and match this tbh.
What nonsense propaganda is this 😂
They said same thing about tanks
Usa uk can suply
Iran can suply
If no one likes it stop the war
Ukraine have no capacity to aim and shoot anything guided, and have no such missiles whatsoever, but, US/UK/Nato are not involved 😵💫😵💫😵💫pathetic hyenas feeding themselves on Ukrainian blood
as response to long range missiles attacks Russia will probably start knocking down US satellites at first, and leave than the west to decide to escalate more or not, which would be catastrophic for all if they do some 'rambo' moves, as arrogant cowboys as they are
Go home Herbert😂😂😂
+50 Countries VS -1
They give them money to use on weapons which they buy off US companies.. these companies lobby the gov $$
The USA scheme in Ukraine only Corruptions and war crimes , Russia have the right to attack Washington, United kingdom,France to selfdefence , Only lies to justify the ban restriction to attack deep in Russia ,it will make no difference, Only lies
It's not how big it is, but what you can do with it. What's the point, when you tied Ukraine's hands behind it's back. Time you let Ukraine decide.
They are waiting for something; either the US election or deeper evaluation of the Russian response and whether its worth it.
Against a weak country they'd have done it months ago. NATO has no limits on its behavior but for opposing power; they do not practice self restraint…."
They won't lift the restrictions because they are scared of Russia. They fear Russia will give Ukraine Gaza treatment.
Zelensky is desperate he is asking for permission to target Russian civilians hoping that will force Russia to negotiate on his terms.
Even Russia didn't enter Ukraine is a banana state, that's sad.
This countries and very rich ,they now send almost a trillion aid to Ukraine
It's sad to know that among the entire politicians in Europe and the US, only Viktor Orban and Donald Trump know the solutions to the war in Ukraine.
What's happened if hoothi used Russian missiles to attack US and western countries
This war mongers really need force to stop this madness
Cry me a river Douglas 😂😂.
I can not stand this bald propagandist
Game changer 🤑💥
Lamy cut our elderly energy help ,but more help for ukraine energy infrastructure, despicable.
Ukraine will negotiate and give territory in 1 year 100% 😅
Send that Herbert man to the Frontline. Ukraine needs his energy right there to regain some lost territory and not on bla bla bla in air-conditioned room
US taxpayers are freaking tired of Colonel Biden's Communist funding to fight a foreign war. A war that freaking Ukraine is losing anyway. No more Communist funding. Biden out!!
Always those who start a war risk a lot and lose a lot, because the effects are "UNPREDICTABLE", for example the war between the USSR and Afghanistan, the losses were so huge that the USSR collapsed. In fact, the war is a total failure in every respect. goals were not achieved in Afghanistan. What's more, the opposing side is happy about the excessive weakening of the enemy's army and economy. So it will be with the current war. I don't think I have anything to add on this topic :(. A095
If you think that Ukraine can able to win Russia in war then you are stupid because even France can not fight Russia. You people just want to destroy Ukrainian life
❤
Never interrupt an enemy making a mistake. Nervous Pavlov reaction to Zelenskyy Kursk misadventure would show Russian weakness, but here Russians showed maturity, good judgment and willingness to exploit enemy's mistakes. Zelenskyy already wasted 12,000 troops and tons of equipment that could have been used at a vital Donbass front that is rapidly crumbling. Now he's losing these villages in the middle of nowhere, he managed to capture at such a staggering cost. This misadventure proved to be another unmitigated disaster for Ukraine.
Blinken seat near blond and British foreign minister near the coloured 🎉
Didn't the US say the Russian assets are beyond their missile range
and all of the sudden the Huthis are shooting at ships with russian long range missiles😅
Waste of money! What will the American taxpayer get from this?
Damn I hate this guy's face,no matter how serious he tries to be he still looks a bum
The permission to attack Russian military targets deep in Russia won't come. After the november election the war will Peter out and end in a frozen conflict. The US than has a secure western Atlantic border and European allies deeply committed to US policies. So the US can devote all its efforts to China, which is its primary target. So a pretty good outcome for the US. Not so good for Europe, unfortunately.
So he represents the US, which knew ukraine would want permission to use long-range missiles. So why does he have to go back and ask someone. Just dithering.
Wow 😮!!!
😂!
Did they say how many billion of dollars made Russian through western trade system???
I would say, guys don’t spit in my face and tell me it’s raining!!!
Stop the show and behave like a man!!!
Notice the naked desire from the host and Hebert's desire to have those weapons sent to Ukraine. The media is not merely playing the role of public informer, but at all stages of escalations, they have played the key lobbying role. So, in this clip Hebert emphasizes that the Ukrainians are begging and emphasizes the Ukrainian case to get this permission.
Also note the elevation of the ISW's opposition to the government being reluctant.
The one case to keep in mind is; the ISW is not a governmental institution but a mere think tank. They don't have a mandate of keeping peace or launching war as they have not been elected by anyone. Sure they can push the agenda of their funders, but for them to have influence they must on whether wars escalate or not they should run a party in an election.
That Hebert does not seem to think of this, exposes the fact that media houses like these have become lobbying institutions for at times nefarious agendas.