Why Russia Won’t Agree to Peace Without Ukraine’s ‘Fortress Belt’
In the ongoing conflict between Ukraine and Russia, territory has emerged as the central stumbling block obstructing the path to peace. The latest U.S.-led proposal, designed to broker a ceasefire, has ignited fierce debate, particularly due to its call for Ukraine to surrender the critical “Fortress Belt.” This fortified strip of land is not merely a geographic entity; it represents a vital component of Ukraine’s national defense.
The proposed peace plan, outlined in a recent Wall Street Journal report, has garnered attention for its bold demands. Ukraine’s leaders, however, find themselves at an impasse, as conceding the Fortress Belt threatens their country’s sovereignty and security. This defensive line has been crucial in repelling Russian advances, serving as a buffer that fortifies key urban centers and infrastructure against invasion.
But what exactly is the Fortress Belt, and why does it hold such significance for both sides? Spanning key locations in eastern Ukraine, this defensive region encompasses not only a physical barrier but also symbolic resilience against external aggression. The Ukrainian government views this territory as indispensable; any loss could be interpreted domestically as a catastrophic failure to protect the nation.
For Russia, the allure of the Fortress Belt is equally compelling. Control over this area would provide strategic military advantages, allowing Russian forces to solidify gains and maintain pressure on Ukrainian defenses. As evidenced by recent military movements, particularly in areas like Pokrovsk, the Kremlin is keenly aware of the tactical importance that this region holds in the broader context of the conflict.
Moving forward, the question remains: what are the implications for peace? With Ukraine staunchly resisting any agreement that entails ceding territory, both nations face a prolonged stalemate. The likelihood of continued military engagement seems imminent unless a compromise can be reached that respects Ukraine’s territorial integrity while addressing Russia’s security concerns.
As the world watches closely, the fate of Ukraine’s Fortress Belt could very well dictate the future of not only the conflict but also the geopolitical landscape of Eastern Europe. The stakes are high, and a resolution that satisfies both parties is crucial for lasting stability in the region.
Watch the video by The Wall Street Journal
Video “Why Russia Won’t Agree to Peace Without Ukraine’s ‘Fortress Belt’ | WSJ” was uploaded on 12/05/2025 to Youtube Channel The Wall Street Journal



































The Zionist Entity Took Palestine And The Golan And Those Who Are Ruling The World Did Not Protest. WHY ????
Gorbachev: thanks God that I am already dead
Serious question. In this world why do fight for a "country" and what even is a country?
Hold the line Ukraine . DJT won’t be POTUS forever Vance won’t be VP forever hang in there until 2025 when the U.S. has a Democrat POTUS more willing to help by giving lethal aid.
Even as a schoolboy, I knew about Byzantine diplomacy, which was defined by creating conflicts between two enemies. But this is a dangerous policy, you need to approach it differentially, understand when it will work, and when, on the contrary, it will harm. Unfortunately, America uses this strategy in a non-differentiated way, not taking into account the situation, but directly, unwisely. During 1941-1945, it was necessary to support Stalin against Hitler in order to first destroy one enemy, and there would be one left instead of two. This is good. Now America believes that if it preserves Russia, it will balance China. This is a primitive repetition in a different situation. If Stalin and Hitler fought among themselves, then they can be weakened. But now Russia and China have postponed the conflict for the future and are acting in tandem to destroy Ukraine, then Europe, then America. Easing pressure on Russia does not mean that it will confront China, but rather a bonus for both aggressors. One of the aggressors will have to be destroyed by its own forces without the help of the other enemy. In the first case, it was possible to turn the enemy into a situational temporary ally. In the second case, it is impossible. If we wait until there is a situational ally in the person of Russia, it will be too late – Russia and China will destroy America.
Ukraine has been winning this war since the beginning of Russians invasion according to globalists sympathizers.
Russia has the right to defend itself
Cant take it themselves? 🤔😂
Give Russia ukraine now
if ukraine thinks they can hold onto it let them try but they were warned.
Russia's never going to agree to peace. They have to be defeated.
Bizzare. Putin invaded Ukraine, kills Ukrainians, and now demands a “security belt” in territory he doesn't control? Putin must think everyone is as dumb as Trump 🤡
Giving Russia the fortifications is like inviting them to conquer Europe. As a European we can not allow this.
You don’t give away areas for nothing. Let Russia return Crimea!
4:17 sad truth
Interesting, Pokrovsk is not listed as a fortress city????
If Russia doesn't get all of Donbass peacefully, they'll have to expend likely 100 thousand or more men for that purpose
Never trust the evil! They eat your souls, not just your lands! whole bunch of theft! Heaven has a jail for greedy people.
with no electricity Ukraine is going to have a hard time stopping the belt from being encircled. At lest the supply lines are going to be very very dangerous. I think thats a lot of POWs when its all done. Why hasn't Russia used it bombers yet?
Russia will get it one way or another.
Well, Western Media used to tell us Russia is fighting with shovels.
WSJ amd theirs world class journalism😂
WSJ used to tell lies by hand now AI ?
Building a fortress belt means they were looking for trouble .