This Poll Exposes a Gender Gap That May Shape 2026 Midterms
In the latest polling data from the Wall Street Journal and NORC, a significant gender gap has emerged regarding perceptions of the economy under President Trump. This disparity, highlighted in the video “This Poll Exposes a Gender Gap That May Shape 2026 Midterms,” reveals that women hold a markedly more negative view of economic conditions than men.
The findings suggest that while men tend to assess the economy based on broader indicators such as the stock market performance and unemployment rates, women focus more on immediate, personal experiences—primarily the costs associated with daily living, such as grocery prices and household expenses. This divergence in perspectives exposes a nuanced understanding of economic satisfaction and its political implications.
Satisfaction Gap: A Divided Perspective
The poll data reveals a clear satisfaction gap: men appear more optimistic about the overall economic landscape, while women express greater concerns regarding financial stability. This gap has crucial ramifications, not only for individual households but also for the political landscape as the nation gears up for the midterms in 2026.
Understanding the Gender Gap Across Categories
Delving deeper into the poll results, the gender gap persists across various categories. Issues such as consumer prices, job security, and overall financial circumstances were significantly viewed through different lenses by each gender. Women reported feeling more uncertain and anxious about their economic situations, while men leaned towards an optimistic portrayal of the economy influenced by macroeconomic data.
The Roots of Uncertainty
Political analysts attribute the heightened sense of uncertainty among women to a combination of factors, including specific financial burdens and societal roles often tied to household management. As essential decision-makers in family finances, women’s perceptions of economic conditions are intricately linked to their everyday lived experiences.
Political Ramifications for the 2026 Midterms
As we consider the upcoming elections, the implications of this gender gap could be profound. Political strategists may need to address these disparities directly, acknowledging women’s concerns about economic stability to rally support. The findings serve as a clarion call for candidates and parties alike to understand and respond to the differing economic attitudes among the electorate.
In summary, the WSJ-NORC poll not only highlights a critical gender gap in perceptions of the economy but also foreshadows potential shifts in voter sentiment as the nation heads towards the midterms. Strategists and candidates will need to heed these insights as they craft their messages and campaigns in a rapidly changing political landscape.
Watch the video by The Wall Street Journal
Video “This Poll Exposes a Gender Gap That May Shape 2026 Midterms | WSJ” was uploaded on 09/24/2025 to Youtube Channel The Wall Street Journal


































Keep up the good work! Your ideas are always so unique and you skillfully captivate your viewers.🫔🧿🎼
Trump is lying about economy. Prices are up on groceries, gas in AZ is now $3.95/gal, my rent just increased $55/mo.
I love this report.. When the old men power 🔋 tips..yeah..buy buy…lol
I've always thought poll reporting was silly at best and lazy journalism at worst. Perhaps the MSM has conditioned women to be pessimistic by promoting the idea of a pay gap (which is vey debatable when all the facts are considered) – its a negative feedback loop
This is not surprising at all
do all men who have the same job title get paid the same ?
Stop relying heavily on polls. After last year's election, many saw how erroneous and misleading they can be.
Why is this scripted but yall act like it’s an interview. Why don’t u just make it an informational video.
Where's the poll link?
The setup of this video is weird. It's like one script being spoken out of two mouths. And then the two speakers are facing each other for some reason.
Possibly the worst video I've ever watched on youtube. There is no real analysis, no thesis, hardly any analysis of the economy besides buzzwords, just all around meaningless garbage. This interview style + quoting of those polled does the opposite of what I imagine it intends to. Thumbnail as well.
wsj needs to tell why there is years of difference between age of reporter and supervisor, where reporter is old and supervisor is young?