European leaders gathered in Paris for an emergency meeting to discuss their role in Ukraine amid concerns over the uncertain future of their security alliance with the United States. German Chancellor Angela Merkel emphasized Europe’s continued support for Ukraine, asserting that peace terms cannot be imposed on Kyiv. She also expressed frustration over the premature discussions of deploying peacekeeping troops to Ukraine.
The meeting was called by French President Emmanuel Macron following the Trump administration’s decision to exclude European leaders from direct negotiations with Russia on resolving the Ukraine conflict. This move has left European leaders feeling sidelined and concerned about the future of transatlantic relations.
During the meeting, experts like Rosie Birchard, DW Correspondent, and Ulrike Franke from the European Council on Foreign Relations provided insights on the situation. Discussions centered on the need for a unified European approach to Ukraine and the importance of diplomatic efforts to prevent further escalation of the conflict.
As tensions continue to simmer in Eastern Europe, European leaders are grappling with the challenge of navigating the complex geopolitical landscape without their traditional ally. The meeting in Paris underscored the urgency of finding a peaceful resolution to the Ukraine crisis while highlighting the need for European unity in the face of uncertainty.
The outcome of the meeting remains to be seen, but one thing is clear: Europe is determined to stand by Ukraine and protect its sovereignty, even as external pressures and geopolitical dynamics evolve.
Watch the video by DW News
Video “German chancellor says there cannot be 'dictated peace' for Ukraine | DW News” was uploaded on 02/17/2025 to Youtube Channel DW News
Let's assume, as we should, that it's true what now several sources published (Estonia, Ukraine, Denmark, …)
that RuZZia is preparing to move several brigades with preserved new equipment to Belarus within months from now,
for "training",
by the way only to stop by Ukrainians continuing to cripple fuel supplies,
and then out of that training starts an §5 incident later this year,
attempting to turn Europe into even more chaos,
stopping supplies for Ukraine.
Would there be any support of US, if polls in US, that then certainly will get conducted,
conducted among interviewees, that wouldn't find the places of concern on a map,
if these polls show a clear majority disapproving support?
That's where we are.
Why discussing and analyzing around and about US?
US isn't any more a security partner.
It is an open adversary to at least two NATO "partners",
Denmark and Canada,
and in principle a third one now as well, Germany, after last Friday.
From there on things don't get easier, but clearer:
Would in that not unlikely case a discussion about European armed forces help?
No.
Would a discussion about higher defense spending help?
No.
The only thing THAT would help is to task the military leadership we all pay for right that,
to come up with a framework, a battle plan,
how to repell that assault.
And they'll do – and repell it.
Because it's still the army that replies on donkeys to supply it's artillery in Donbas.
Conclusion:
Task these military leaders RIGHT NOW with that.
To be prepared.
That wins additional lee room to the one Ukrainians provide.
Then tell the electorate finally frankly what's demanded – and what the unique opportunities are in that for Europe, otherwise divided under lunatics, but then the envy for investment of the world.
The electorate WILL be happy to provide a mandate,
for a strategy
from which again to work back to solutions by the military leaders we anyway pay.
Russia will never agree for UK troops to station on Peace keeping pretext.
He still chantsolar…not have debate and elections…X…not
Trump sold out Ukraine and is calling for ethnic cleansing in Gaza but holds on to hopes of a Nobel Peace Prize which he should never be given to him . What does Vladimir Putin have on Trump ?
Who is your daddy?
Scholz does not want to be dictated Peace…it also initially refused to send Panther tanks and still refuses to send Taurus missiles…and troops on the ground.
Having said that Germany should be quiet and let America manage the situation.
Better a dictated peace than none!
lol of course, when it comes time for Europe to pay its fair share they find excuses to avoid bearing their burden.
Well since Brexit the UK is not in the EU. So what they say has little actual bearing on what EU does as such not to mention that the plan for 76 K going to 73 K troop and 30 k reserve. Russia has been rebuilding their arm forces, their doctrine and their economy for the last 3 years. Realistically a near tearm European force probably would have a Franco-german core (just the more integrated less disjointed command/control and most advanced electronic warfare and communication equipement we have at the moment.(probably not enough of it but ), with other willing european countries being more involved at "independent" brigade level. Europe need to get the people, the equipement and the infrastructure fast at least for a meaningfull reaction force.
Then America is not going to get involved
Europe doesn’t have a spine
Germany's lust for power is on full display
I wonder what Europe is going to do when Trump realises that Putin aligns more with conservative American family values than Europe
i read a comment made by trump on achinese outlet, sayingthe Europeans would all go running to Trump like dogs wagging their tails
Peace cannot be forced but democracy should be forced.
Scholz gets ousted on Sunday?
Adios!
auf wiedersehen!
Sianara!
Chuis!
Tot Ziens!
C'ya!
Fascists now run the US.
What a jypocrite.
Nato pushed peace from jugoslavia to lybia,syria….all around the world.
Sudenlly they play dumb
Schultz, enjoy your last week in power. Start stripping your office supplies your career is over!